DOI: 10.15368/theses.2010.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Long Term Effects of Alendronate on Bone Mass Preservation of the Femur with Articular Surface and Total Hip Replacements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A bone UMAT which would accept user defined input variables had already been created (Hryce, 2010). The UMAT was able to accept a text file containing the initial porosity data which would then be applied to the FE model in ABAQUS.…”
Section: Pre-condition Data Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bone UMAT which would accept user defined input variables had already been created (Hryce, 2010). The UMAT was able to accept a text file containing the initial porosity data which would then be applied to the FE model in ABAQUS.…”
Section: Pre-condition Data Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the cells are differentiated, the osteoblasts form new bone which is a much slower process than resorption [12]. The time for each stage differs: resorption lasts about 3 weeks, formation lasts about 3 months, and the total remodeling process takes about 4 months [12,18]. A sketch of an osteonal BMU can be seen in Figure 12, which displays the stages of resorption, reversal, and refilling.…”
Section: Remodeling Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the two femur models, the boundary condition used was a pinned constraint at the distal end [20].…”
Section: Load and Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%