2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2008.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the meteor head echo using Arecibo radar observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These characteristic meteoroid parameters were chosen because this is a commonly measured size class of meteoroids among the billions of daily meteors ; Dyrud and Janches, 2008). The meteor simulation of the type shown in Fig.…”
Section: Global Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These characteristic meteoroid parameters were chosen because this is a commonly measured size class of meteoroids among the billions of daily meteors ; Dyrud and Janches, 2008). The meteor simulation of the type shown in Fig.…”
Section: Global Model Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This figure displays the head echo trace as a diagonal colored line, with color corresponding to the trail electron line density per meter divided by 10 6 , such that it may appear on the same color bar as the FBGD growth rate shown in the non-specular trail portion of the RTI plot that appears after the head-echo. We have developed numerous head echo models (see Dyrud and Janches, 2008) and have opted to plot a parameter which is related to head echo strength, but is also of direct physical relevance to the development of plasma instability in the trail. To the right of the head echo, this plot displays the calculated, non-negative, FBGD growth rate as a function of time and altitude for a diffusing meteor column.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent measurements at ALTAIR, with more dynamic mass estimates as well as scattering masses, are described by Close et al [2002cClose et al [ , 2004Close et al [ , 2005. Dynamic mass measurements together with computer model simulations are described by Bass et al [2008] and Dyrud and Janches [2008].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particles entering the atmosphere with velocities >11 km/s produce luminous trails of ionized gas that allow for the detection and characterization of individual meteors [10][11][12][13] . Radar observations of meteors are sensitive to particles with masses between 10 −9 − 10 −3 g. The interpretation of meteor observation using radar techniques is subject to a number of biases, as the ablation and ionization are functions of the particles' mass, density and incoming velocity and angle.…”
Section: A Motivation and Importancementioning
confidence: 99%