2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the non-trivial behavior of anisotropic beams: A simple Timoshenko beam with enhanced stress recovery and constitutive relations

Abstract: This paper analyzes the non-trivial influence of the material anisotropy on the structural behavior of an anisotropic multilayer planar beam. Indeed, analytical results available in literature are limited to homogeneous beams and several aspects has not been addressed yet, impeding an in-depth understanding of the mechanical response of anisotropic structural elements. This paper proposes an effective recovery of stress distribution and an energetically consistent evaluation of constitutive relations to be use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, classical beam models generalize the external load through the entire crosssection. This hypothesis, although not best representing surface forces and partial cross-sectional loads, is widely accepted in beam modeling approaches (Masjedi et al 2019;Weaver 2020a, b, 2022;Masjedi et al 2021;Doeva et al 2020aDoeva et al , b, 2021Doeva et al , 2022Balduzzi et al 2019;Bertolini et al 2019;Bertolini and Taglialegne 2020;Chockalingam et al 2020Chockalingam et al , 2021Vilar et al 2021a). Another issue not addressed in analytical laminated beam formulations is for cases where the stiffness distribution is different from the transverse and axial load distributions, which gives rise to non-classical transverse stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, classical beam models generalize the external load through the entire crosssection. This hypothesis, although not best representing surface forces and partial cross-sectional loads, is widely accepted in beam modeling approaches (Masjedi et al 2019;Weaver 2020a, b, 2022;Masjedi et al 2021;Doeva et al 2020aDoeva et al , b, 2021Doeva et al , 2022Balduzzi et al 2019;Bertolini et al 2019;Bertolini and Taglialegne 2020;Chockalingam et al 2020Chockalingam et al , 2021Vilar et al 2021a). Another issue not addressed in analytical laminated beam formulations is for cases where the stiffness distribution is different from the transverse and axial load distributions, which gives rise to non-classical transverse stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the state of stress on beam surfaces is governed by Cauchy’s traction-stress relation, resulting in non-vanishing transverse stresses (Balduzzi et al. 2016 , 2017a , b , c , d , 2019 ; Mercuri et al. 2020 ; Hodges et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a vast amount of work in the literature [928] studying the static deformation or the vibration frequency of a rod/beam structure composed of linear anisotropic material with various shapes and boundary conditions. We focus on the static deformation of a rod structure in the current paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with [25], in the current paper, more insightful information about the coupling effects are revealed in Section 4. Balduzzi et al [22] developed a recursive procedure for recovering stress based on Timoshenko’s beam theory. This model was applied to a multilayered planar rod composed of anisotropic material with four elastic moduli and the influence of material anisotropy on the structure behavior was investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%