2021
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1970953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the optimal sequence of biologic therapies in plaque psoriasis in Spain

Abstract: The purpose of this manuscript was to illustrate the impact of the place in the treatment sequence on the cost and cost-effectiveness of different biologics for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Materials and MethodsWe developed a treatment sequence model and focused on seven different biological treatment options and 840 combinations of treatment sequences. The model converted cost of treatment to a cost per responder by dividing treatment cost by expected number of patients achieving PASI100… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results highlight that recommending clinicians prescribe more efficacious treatments earlier in the course of therapy provides a greater opportunity to minimize treatment failures and maximize patient outcomes. These findings are supported by other literature, whereby in a single disease area (PsO), modelled treatment sequences starting with more efficacious therapies may have greater health outcomes [ 33 , 34 ]; our contribution has been to show that current prescribing patterns, often limited by fixed budgets, have potential to improve patient outcomes further. PsO has the largest difference in efficacy between treatment sequences; it is therefore especially important to assess where a country’s prescribing policies and behaviours sit within the wide range of possible outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results highlight that recommending clinicians prescribe more efficacious treatments earlier in the course of therapy provides a greater opportunity to minimize treatment failures and maximize patient outcomes. These findings are supported by other literature, whereby in a single disease area (PsO), modelled treatment sequences starting with more efficacious therapies may have greater health outcomes [ 33 , 34 ]; our contribution has been to show that current prescribing patterns, often limited by fixed budgets, have potential to improve patient outcomes further. PsO has the largest difference in efficacy between treatment sequences; it is therefore especially important to assess where a country’s prescribing policies and behaviours sit within the wide range of possible outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A number of studies have attempted to explore or narrow down which sequences of treatments may be more optimal for patient outcomes at a single-disease level, either through analysis of real-world observation data [ 31 , 32 ], treatment sequencing models [ 33 , 34 ], or network meta-analyses (NMAs) [ 35 ]. However, to date an approach that combines treatment sequence efficacy with local current prescribing practices, and presents the relative impact of cost and benefit associated with adopting the most efficacious sequences across these diseases, has yet to be explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we did not analyse the costs in the different lines of treatment. Edgeberg et al studied the impact of the place in the treatment sequence on the cost and cost-effectiveness of different biologics for patients with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis 41. They concluded that the most cost-effective treatment sequence was brodalumab-risankizumab-guselkumab-ixekizumab, with a cost per responder of €139 281 during the first 5 years of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the cost of biologic drugs, it is important to consider the cost-effectiveness of different treatment options. 11 , 12 , 17 This is an important consideration, as the choice of treatment sequence can have a significant impact on the overall cost of treatment, as well as the likelihood of achieving good disease control. 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 11 , 12 , 17 This is an important consideration, as the choice of treatment sequence can have a significant impact on the overall cost of treatment, as well as the likelihood of achieving good disease control. 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%