2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Personality of Participants During Group Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The automatic classification of personality impressions in professional radio broadcasts [16] found that Extraversion and Conscientiousness were the personality impressions with highest classification performance (with up to 73% and 71% accuracy) and that the rest of the traits were more difficult to predict. In face-to-face meetings [10], automatic nonverbal analysis predicted Extraversion with up to R 2 = 22% (no other Big-Five personality traits were investigated), whereas in self-presentations videos [1], research found that nonverbal behavior was useful to predict Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability and Extraversion (in this order). In this context, the only work we know of that has investigated verbal content and personality in face-toface interactions is [15], were models using text features achieved better performance than models based on audio features for Extraversion (R 2 = 24%), and Conscientiousness (R 2 = 18%).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automatic classification of personality impressions in professional radio broadcasts [16] found that Extraversion and Conscientiousness were the personality impressions with highest classification performance (with up to 73% and 71% accuracy) and that the rest of the traits were more difficult to predict. In face-to-face meetings [10], automatic nonverbal analysis predicted Extraversion with up to R 2 = 22% (no other Big-Five personality traits were investigated), whereas in self-presentations videos [1], research found that nonverbal behavior was useful to predict Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability and Extraversion (in this order). In this context, the only work we know of that has investigated verbal content and personality in face-toface interactions is [15], were models using text features achieved better performance than models based on audio features for Extraversion (R 2 = 24%), and Conscientiousness (R 2 = 18%).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research has demonstrated the feasibility of recognizing user traits in "rich" multi-modal and dialog interfaces (Goren-Bar et al. 2006;Lepri, Mana, Cappelletti, Pianesi, & Zancanaro, 2009;Mairesse, Walker, Mehl, & Moore, 2007) and in Web and mobile phone interfaces (Chittaranjan et al, 2012;Golbeck et al, 2011). Such techniques could possibly be employed in building a profile of users' personal traits to be used as part of personalityzation.…”
Section: Neuroticismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, personality plays a very important role on how users assess multimodal interfaces and their willingness to interact with them. In the same way as humans understand other humans' behaviour and react accordingly to it in terms of the observation of everyday behaviour (Lepri et al, 2009), the personality of the system can be considered as a relatively stable pattern that affects its emotion expression and behaviour and differentiates it from other multimodal interfaces (Xiao et al, 2005).…”
Section: The Role Of Affectmentioning
confidence: 99%