1996
DOI: 10.1177/0361198196155200122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Process of Adoption of Telecommuting: Comprehensive Framework

Abstract: A comprehensive model of the telecommuting adoption process, incorporating employer and employee perspectives, is developed. A probabilistic modeling approach is taken. The employer decision to offer a telecommuting program is modeled as a function of motivations and constraints and of the perceived impacts of telecommuting on the organization's productivity and costs. The employee decision to adopt telecommuting is modeled as a function of motivations and constraints as well as of the impact of the program on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, individuals in households with more workers have a higher preference to adopt telecommuting and to telecommute frequently relative to households with fewer workers. As household income increases, individuals are significantly more likely to telecommute, a finding that is consistent with many previous studies (see Bernardino and Ben-Akiva, 1996;Mannering and Mokhtarian, 1995;Popuri and Bhat, 2003). This may be attributed to more control over work-location-related and work-timing choices as one`climbs the work ladder'.…”
Section: Household Demographicssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, individuals in households with more workers have a higher preference to adopt telecommuting and to telecommute frequently relative to households with fewer workers. As household income increases, individuals are significantly more likely to telecommute, a finding that is consistent with many previous studies (see Bernardino and Ben-Akiva, 1996;Mannering and Mokhtarian, 1995;Popuri and Bhat, 2003). This may be attributed to more control over work-location-related and work-timing choices as one`climbs the work ladder'.…”
Section: Household Demographicssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the study was limited by the small percentage of (frequent) telecommuters within the survey sample. Several other revealed-preference studies have also focused on the choice of telecommuting, occasionally with some representation of frequency in the broad manner of Mannering and Mokhtarian (1995) (eg see Bernardino and Ben-Akiva, 1996;Mokhtarian and Salomon, 1996b;1997). Another revealed-preference study with a more national focus (rather than the regional focus of the studies just mentioned ) is the one by Drucker and Khattak (2000).…”
Section: Overview Of Earlier Studies and Current Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there have been high expectations of telecommuting as a traffic-managing tool, an extensive amount of research has addressed impacts on travel patterns as a whole (e.g., Balepur, Varma, & Mokhtarian, 1998;Bernardo & Ben-Akiva, 1996;Mokhtarian, 1998). Further research has dealt with identification of typologies of telecommuters as a way to assess future growth and trends of telecommuting (Drucker & Khattak, 2000;Mannering & Mokhtarian, 1995;Popuri & Bhat, 2003;Sullivan, Mahmassani, & Yen, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies primarily investigated two aspects: factors that influence choices/frequencies of telecommuting and subsequent travel demand impacts. Bernardino and Ben-Akiva (1996) estimated structural equation models to investigate the joint probability of workers’ telecommuting frequency and availability of telecommuting options. They found that telecommuting was positively associated with workers’ productivity as well as their quality of life.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%