2023
DOI: 10.1039/d2sm01463g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the resistive viscoelasticity of conductive polymer composites for sensor usage

Abstract: With the development of fully printed electronics, soft sensors are in demand in various fields, such as wearable electronics, soft machines, etc. Most soft resistive sensors are made of conductive...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also not discussed previously is the similarity of the resistance–strain relationship of these materials to the stress–strain relationship of viscoelastic materials. Other authors have noticed this similarity and introduced phenomenological models of the “viscoelastic resistivity” of such materials that are capable of fitting the resistivity‐strain data, while acknowledging the complex array of factors that could be affecting the conductivity of these materials under strain, including transversal contraction, as well as filler rearrangement and reorientation 77–79 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also not discussed previously is the similarity of the resistance–strain relationship of these materials to the stress–strain relationship of viscoelastic materials. Other authors have noticed this similarity and introduced phenomenological models of the “viscoelastic resistivity” of such materials that are capable of fitting the resistivity‐strain data, while acknowledging the complex array of factors that could be affecting the conductivity of these materials under strain, including transversal contraction, as well as filler rearrangement and reorientation 77–79 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have noticed this similarity and introduced phenomenological models of the "viscoelastic resistivity" of such materials that are capable of fitting the resistivitystrain data, while acknowledging the complex array of factors that could be affecting the conductivity of these materials under strain, including transversal contraction, as well as filler rearrangement and reorientation. [77][78][79] It seems likely that, in general, changes to the particle network structure are a more significant cause of piezoresistivity than volumetric change. The work presented here lays the ground for an improved understanding of the complex relationship between deformation and network structure.…”
Section: Other Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the widespread awareness and utilization of this effect, a consensus as to the mechanisms underlying it has yet to emerge, with various works attributing it to volumetric change [15,17], particle reorientation [18][19][20], and network rearrangement and nanocavitation [21,22]. Phenomenological viscoelastic models have been successful in modelling the time dependent behaviour of the resistance [14,23], but a clear link between the viscoelasticity of the polymer and the time dependent piezoresistivity has not yet been established. This work presents the results of a structured characterization scheme investigating the factors affecting the piezoresistivity of carbon-elastomer composites, focusing on two widely available and commonly used PDMS (silicone) elastomers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CPCs-based strain sensors, the insulating polymer matrix provides flexibility and stretchability, while the conductive materials construct the conductive sensor network. Due to the viscoelastic nature of the polymer matrix, the CPCs-based strain sensors exhibit resistive viscoelasticity properties [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], such as rate dependence [ 10 , 11 ], relaxation [ 12 , 13 ], hysteresis [ 14 , 15 ], and dynamic resistance response [ 16 ]. Resistive viscoelasticity affects performance parameters such as linearity, sensitivity, repeatability, cycle stability, etc., which are critical for evaluating strain sensor materials [ 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a micromechanical piezoresistive model study showed that the time-dependent transverse deformation leads to network compaction and is the mechanism behind resistance relaxation and hysteresis [ 21 ]. Combing the tunneling theory, a multi-branch model was developed, which used only a single set of parameters to predict the resistance relaxation behaviors of CPCs under different strains and different loading rates [ 11 ]. Zhang et al found that resistance drift/decay for most CPCs under quasi-static and dynamic loadings is a consequence of the relaxation of both the polymer chains and the conductive network [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%