1979
DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(79)90061-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the results of two recent mesoscale dispersion experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 and the temperature change with altitude (AT/AZ) method proposed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 5 A review of turbulent diffusion typing schemes has been prepared by Gifford 6 and a comparison of hourly predicted stability classes for a one-year period was reported by Sedefian and Bennett. 7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 and the temperature change with altitude (AT/AZ) method proposed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 5 A review of turbulent diffusion typing schemes has been prepared by Gifford 6 and a comparison of hourly predicted stability classes for a one-year period was reported by Sedefian and Bennett. 7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the IWV band in Figure 1, the time evolution of 27 backward trajectories (depicted as white curves) from time t = 0 (06 UTC 23 June 2023) is also shown. This ensemble of 27 backward trajectories is calculated from 6 hourly NCEP global reanalysis data with a horizontal resolution of 2.5° × 2.5° using the HYSPLIT trajectory model (Draxler & Rolph, 2010). Each ensemble member corresponds to slightly different initial conditions obtained by offsetting the meteorological data by one meteorological grid point in the horizontal direction, and 0.01 sigma units in the vertical direction (Stein et al., 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 shows the locations of these stations. Notably, other methods of trajectory calculation may be preferred over the method used here, since several improvements have been made to trajectory calculation since Draxler [1979] proposed his method, as reviewed by Stohl [1998]. For example, the trajectory calculation based on the wind fields produced from the numerical models could be expected to be superior to those based on the method used here.…”
Section: Model Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The backward trajectories were calculated according to the hourly mixing‐layer average wind fields on days of ozone pollution. The wind fields were determined according to the method proposed by Draxler [1979]. This method used twice‐daily rawinsonde data from upper air stations and hourly surface data from the much denser network of surface stations.…”
Section: Model Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%