2013
DOI: 10.1364/ao.52.000640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the scattering properties of mineral aerosols using concave fractal polyhedra

Abstract: The single-scattering properties of concave fractal polyhedra are investigated, with particle size parameters ranging from the Rayleigh to geometric-optics regimes. Two fractal shape parameters, irregularity and aspect ratio, are used to iteratively construct "generations" of irregular fractal particles. The pseudospectral time-domain (PSTD) method and the improved geometric-optics method (IGOM) are combined to compute the single-scattering properties of fractal particles over the range of size parameters. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Merikallio et al (2011) carried out a comprehensive study of spheroids in optical modeling of mineral dusts and recommended a power law shape distribution for reproducing measurements. Apart from spheroids, many other aerosol models, including the Gaussian random particle (Muinonen et al, 1996;Veihelmann et al, 2006), triaxial ellipsoid (Bi et al, 2009), nonsymmetric hexahedra (Bi et al, 2010), agglomerate debris (Zubko et al, 2013), and fractal polyhedral (Jin et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2013) models, have been developed to improve dust optical modeling. Until now, there has not been a standard or a consistent approach for dust optical modeling, and persistent research efforts have been devoted to developing realistic or simplified dust models (see reviews in Nousiainen, 2009, andKahnert et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Merikallio et al (2011) carried out a comprehensive study of spheroids in optical modeling of mineral dusts and recommended a power law shape distribution for reproducing measurements. Apart from spheroids, many other aerosol models, including the Gaussian random particle (Muinonen et al, 1996;Veihelmann et al, 2006), triaxial ellipsoid (Bi et al, 2009), nonsymmetric hexahedra (Bi et al, 2010), agglomerate debris (Zubko et al, 2013), and fractal polyhedral (Jin et al, 2016;Liu et al, 2013) models, have been developed to improve dust optical modeling. Until now, there has not been a standard or a consistent approach for dust optical modeling, and persistent research efforts have been devoted to developing realistic or simplified dust models (see reviews in Nousiainen, 2009, andKahnert et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These shapes represent generalizations of common ice crystal habits (Bailey and Hallett, 2009). An idealized dust-like particle with fractal facets was used to model aerosols (Liu et al, 2013). These particles are nonspherical and thus will yield different measured depolarization ratios depending on their orientation in the CASPOL.…”
Section: Modeling the Depolarization Ratio Of Water Droplets Aerosolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different nonspherical shapes have been developed and applied, such as spheroids (Mishchenko et al, 1997;Dubovik et al, 2002;Ge et al, 2011;Merikallio et al, 2011), ellipsoids (Bi et al, 2009;Meng et al, 2010;Kemppinen et al, 2015), and superellipsoids (Bi et al, 2018a). Additionally, more complex and irregular particles have also been considered, e.g., spatial Poisson-Voronoi tessellation (Ishimoto et al, 2010), Gaussian random field (GRF) particles (Grynko et al, 2013), Koch-fractal particles (Liu et al, 2013;Jin et al, 2016), and nonsymmetric hexahedra Liu et al, 2014). These "irregular" geometries as well as spheroids can achieve close agreement with measurements by using appropriate shape parameters or combining the results from multiple shapes, which indicates that certain geometries may be optically similar or equivalent with respect to scattering light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%