Proceedings 4th IEEE Workshop on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE '95)
DOI: 10.1109/enabl.1995.484547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the software process using coordination rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Process definition usually lies on Process Modeling Languages (PML) based on some linguistic paradigms such as (Cass et al, 2000), Petri nets or logical languages; several of them are discussed in (Fuggetta, 2000). Others are componentbased software process support (Gary et al, 1998), role-based approaches (Kopka and Wellen, 2002), coordination rules (Ciancarini, 1995); some interesting reflections can be found in (Barnes and Gray, 2000). Even process support could based on tools integration mechanisms, like in (Pohl et al, 1999).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process definition usually lies on Process Modeling Languages (PML) based on some linguistic paradigms such as (Cass et al, 2000), Petri nets or logical languages; several of them are discussed in (Fuggetta, 2000). Others are componentbased software process support (Gary et al, 1998), role-based approaches (Kopka and Wellen, 2002), coordination rules (Ciancarini, 1995); some interesting reflections can be found in (Barnes and Gray, 2000). Even process support could based on tools integration mechanisms, like in (Pohl et al, 1999).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%