2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-013-0430-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Time-Varying and Level-Dependent Effects of the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex in Auditory Nerve Responses

Abstract: The medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) has been hypothesized to provide benefit for listening in noisy environments. This advantage can be attributed to a feedback mechanism that suppresses auditory nerve (AN) firing in continuous background noise, resulting in increased sensitivity to a tone or speech. MOC neurons synapse on outer hair cells (OHCs), and their activity effectively reduces cochlear gain. The computational model developed in this study implements the time-varying, characteristic frequency (CF) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the ipsilateral effect of the MOCR may be either equal to or stronger than the contralateral effect (Lilaonitkul and Guinan, 2009), more gain reduction might be expected with an ipsilateral elicitor. Recent modeling work has enabled the quantification of previous physiological data in the cat in terms of amount of gain reduction in response to ipsilateral noise (Chintanpalli et al, 2012;Smalt et al, 2013). Those results are consistent with over 20 dB of gain reduction in the data sets modeled.…”
Section: Relationship To Previous Results and Caveatssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…However, as the ipsilateral effect of the MOCR may be either equal to or stronger than the contralateral effect (Lilaonitkul and Guinan, 2009), more gain reduction might be expected with an ipsilateral elicitor. Recent modeling work has enabled the quantification of previous physiological data in the cat in terms of amount of gain reduction in response to ipsilateral noise (Chintanpalli et al, 2012;Smalt et al, 2013). Those results are consistent with over 20 dB of gain reduction in the data sets modeled.…”
Section: Relationship To Previous Results and Caveatssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Other masking models based on the assumption that forward masking results from adaptation in the auditory nerve (e.g. [7072]) may also provide a good fit to our data. However, such models are usually based on complex signal detection mechanisms that may have complicated the comparison to the simple temporal window model approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In contrast, this reflex may be partially dysfunctional in listeners with hearing impairment due to OHC damage (Collet et al 1992) and result in a relatively shallower off-frequency TMC. Previous studies have simulated the MOC reflex using the Zilany et al (Smalt et al 2014). This model and other models (e.g., Aguilar et al 2013) could be used in future studies to test the hypothesis that the MOC reflex contributes to relatively steep off-frequency TMC slopes in some listeners.…”
Section: Sensitivity To F Mmentioning
confidence: 99%