Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0383-1_132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the Ultrasonic Radiation of Shear Wave Angle Beam Transducers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At this point, the incident wavefields of the elastodynamic model could be evaluated through direct numerical integration procedures, but this type of evaluation would be computationally costly to do because of the two dimensional nature of the integration. By using the edge element technique discussed in earlier papers [3,7], the post stationary phaseform ofthe wavefields can be significantly simplified (numerically) by reducing the order of integration from 2-D to 1-D, thus saving computational time while retaining the same Ievel of accuracy as the more numerically intensive approaches. A paraxial assumption could also be made at this juncture [2], but in this case, a certain amount of accuracy would be lost in the very nearfield areas of the wavefield.…”
Section: Angle Beam Transoucer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…At this point, the incident wavefields of the elastodynamic model could be evaluated through direct numerical integration procedures, but this type of evaluation would be computationally costly to do because of the two dimensional nature of the integration. By using the edge element technique discussed in earlier papers [3,7], the post stationary phaseform ofthe wavefields can be significantly simplified (numerically) by reducing the order of integration from 2-D to 1-D, thus saving computational time while retaining the same Ievel of accuracy as the more numerically intensive approaches. A paraxial assumption could also be made at this juncture [2], but in this case, a certain amount of accuracy would be lost in the very nearfield areas of the wavefield.…”
Section: Angle Beam Transoucer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few years, we have turned our attention specifically to the incident wavefields produced by these transducers and investigated a number of beam models that can be applied to these types of inspection problems. Comparisons of models based on Gauss-Hermite expansions, boundary diffraction waves, paraxial and non paraxial approxirnations have been made [2,3] for unfocused transducers residing in a fluid and oriented obliquely incident to planar fluidsolid interfaces (see Figure 1a). In these models, the firstmedium was taken tobe a fluid, while in reality, angle beam transducers actually employ a contact compressional wave transducer acting on the surface of an elastic solid wedge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations