2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12601-016-0007-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the underwater light field fluctuations in coastal oceanic waters: Validation with experimental data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within aquatic environments, peak sensitivity of the LWS receptor was greater for species from turbid water compared to those from shallow, clear water or deep water. Turbid waters tend to have a higher proportion of long wavelength light compared to clear water because the suspended particles attenuate shorter wavelengths (Jones et al., 2021 ; Sundarabalan et al., 2016 ). Numerous studies have documented that species inhabiting turbid waters tend to have red‐shifted photoreceptors compared to species in clear waters (Carleton, 2009 ; Carleton et al., 2020 ; Corbo, 2021 ; Lythgoe et al., 1994 ; Nagloo et al., 2016 ) and many of these species achieve this by changing the chromophore used or the ratio of A1/A2 chromophores (Corbo, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within aquatic environments, peak sensitivity of the LWS receptor was greater for species from turbid water compared to those from shallow, clear water or deep water. Turbid waters tend to have a higher proportion of long wavelength light compared to clear water because the suspended particles attenuate shorter wavelengths (Jones et al., 2021 ; Sundarabalan et al., 2016 ). Numerous studies have documented that species inhabiting turbid waters tend to have red‐shifted photoreceptors compared to species in clear waters (Carleton, 2009 ; Carleton et al., 2020 ; Corbo, 2021 ; Lythgoe et al., 1994 ; Nagloo et al., 2016 ) and many of these species achieve this by changing the chromophore used or the ratio of A1/A2 chromophores (Corbo, 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nett effect of the attenuation at both ends of the PAR spectrum was to monochromate the light with increasing depth, shifting the peak in the underwater spectrum 100 nm to the greenyellow waveband peaking at >575 nm. The shift is a well-known characteristic of turbid water (Van Duin et al, 2001;Mobley et al, 2004;Sundarabalan et al, 2016) and the loss of blue light is significant for corals as green-yellow light is poorly absorbed and hence less useful for photosynthesis (Morel, 1978(Morel, , 1991. The implications are that sediment resuspension events in the inner GBR can result in a loss of light quantity and quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three field surveys were performed in Lake Chaohu in 2013 (28 May,(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) July, and 10-12 October) [7]. Water samples were obtained from 9 depths (surface, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.7, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 3.0 m) using an ad hoc vertical collection device.…”
Section: Field-measured Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparent optical properties (AOPs) are optical properties that depend on IOPs and ambient light [23]. The underwater light field depends on the sun's position, the wavelength of light, the scattering and absorption properties of water constitutes, water depth, aerosols, roughness of water surface, and cloud conditions [23,24]. The radiative transfer equation (RTE) provides a connection between IOPs and AOPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%