2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(00)00185-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the velocity field of the electroosmotic flow in charged capillaries and in capillary columns packed with charged particles: interstitial and intraparticle velocities in capillary electrochromatography systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
92
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EOF modeling is a great aid to understand the function of the control parameters. Early general mathematical models tried to describe the velocity field of the EOF in open and packed capillaries [134]. Later an analytical solution was published for hydrophobic rectangular microchannels considering the electrokinetic effect [135].…”
Section: Flow Generation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EOF modeling is a great aid to understand the function of the control parameters. Early general mathematical models tried to describe the velocity field of the EOF in open and packed capillaries [134]. Later an analytical solution was published for hydrophobic rectangular microchannels considering the electrokinetic effect [135].…”
Section: Flow Generation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of a charged capillary inner wall on the radial distribution of EOF velocities may be estimated by [58,75] (6) where I 0 is the zero-order modified Bessel function of the first kind, r eff an effective capillary radius accounting for the no-slip condition at the inner wall of the column, and b characterizes the overall permeability of a bed [76] b 3 a1Àe bed 2 r…”
Section: Electrokinetic Wall Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the pluglike flow profile in CEC, the HETP is expected to be smaller, and the velocity of the EOF is a very weak function (i.e., almost independent) of the particles' diameters. Moreover, the film mass transfer coefficient is approximately proportional to the average diameter of the packing material in p-CEC or, in the case of microchannel devices, varies with the size of the channel (8,9). Thus, for electroosmotically driven flows in packed-bed or porous monolithic CEC systems, the film mass transfer coefficient and the intraparticle EOF varies with the size of the interstitial channels for bulk flow.…”
Section: B Ba As Si Ic Cs Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The axial dispersion A term for a neutral solute is much smaller Sample cleanup still represents a major bottleneck to using CEC as a than that obtained with a parabolic velocity profile in cap-HPLC. Finally, for particles of a certain pore size, an intraparticle EOF exists that significantly enhances intraparticle mass transfer, and this EOF increases with the average packing material pore diameter and the pore interconnectivity (8,9,36).…”
Section: P Pe Er Rs Sp Pe Ec Ct Ti IV Ve Es Smentioning
confidence: 99%