Modeling the volatility of real GDP growth: The case of Japan revisited

Abstract

Previous studies (e.g., Hamori, 2000;Ho and Tsui, 2003;Fountas et al., 2004) find high volatility persistence of economic growth rates using generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH) specifications. This paper reexamines the Japanese case, using the same approach and showing that this finding of high volatility persistence reflects the Great Moderation, which features a sharp decline in the variance as well as two falls in the mean of the growth rates identified by Perrons (1998, 2003) multiple structural change test. Our empirical results provide new evidence. First, excess kurtosis drops substantially or disappears in the GARCH or exponential GARCH model that corrects for an additive outlier. Second, using the outlier-corrected data, the integrated GARCH effect or high volatility persistence remains in the specification once we introduce intercept-shift dummies into the mean equation. Third, the time-varying variance falls sharply, only when we incorporate the break in the variance equation. Fourth, the ARCH in mean model finds no effects of our more correct measure of output volatility on output growth or of output growth on its volatility. Journal of Economic Literature Classification: C32, E32, O40

The Impact of Political Instability on Inflation Volatility in Africa

“…The normality test (Jarque–Bera) is, however, not fulfilled in the majority of equations. My results are similar to Fang and Miller's (), who also fail the normality test in most cases. Non‐normality may result in standard errors that are inappropriate for inference.…”

Exchange Rate Volatility and Uncovered Interest Rate Parity in the European Emerging Economies

“…According to the break test results, the Czech Republic and Romania have two and Serbia has one structural break in the mean of the series, but all countries have at least one break in the variance. In order to avoid poor specification in CGARCH-M models, we used dummy variables to accommodate the extraordinary changes, similarly as Fang andMiller (2009), Cunado et al (2006), Ewing and Malik (2013) tackled their problems with breaks in GARCH models. For every break in the mean and variance equation a dummy variable was created and inserted into the models.…”

Bidirectional linkage between inflation and inflation uncertainty – the case of Eastern European countries

“…If GARCH models totally capture unconditional skewness and leptokurticity, the standardized residuals should reflect a normal distribution, as emphasized by Fang and Miller (2009). Otherwise, if standardized residuals still register heterogeneous behaviour after GARCH process utilization, then empirical data are probably polluted with structural breaks.…”

“…The procedure was conducted in similar way as presented in the research of Cunado, Biscarri, and de Gracia (2006), Fang and Miller (2009), Ewing and Malik (2013), that is, dummy variable takes unity from the break date onward and zero otherwise. We determined the time of structural breaks without prior knowledge of time period, utilizing a statistical technique of Bai and Perron (2003).…”