2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling the wake dynamics of a marine hydrokinetic turbine using different actuator representations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Table 1, few studies conduct this validation. Numerical studies simulate turbines between 1 and 10 m. Only Sandoval et al (2021) and Lazzerini et al (2022) numerically study turbines smaller than 0,27 and 0,42 m, respectively. While the experimental studies evaluate turbines on a scale between 0,109 and 0,8 m. Only Lazzerini et al (2022) simulated the rotor to be the same size as the scale model they experimented with.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in Table 1, few studies conduct this validation. Numerical studies simulate turbines between 1 and 10 m. Only Sandoval et al (2021) and Lazzerini et al (2022) numerically study turbines smaller than 0,27 and 0,42 m, respectively. While the experimental studies evaluate turbines on a scale between 0,109 and 0,8 m. Only Lazzerini et al (2022) simulated the rotor to be the same size as the scale model they experimented with.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy in turbine representation leads to the decision to calibrate based on the flow field from 1.5D downstream in a zone of width 3D to also capture the expansion width of the far wake. It should be noted that this is typically the region of highest error between not only differing turbine representation methods, but also to measured data; existing research has already demonstrated that accurately capturing the wake dynamics may require investigation of several different approaches to turbine modelling (Sandoval et al, 2021). The central region of the wake is well calibrated, with increased r.m.s.…”
Section: Calibration Of Floris Wake Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy in turbine representation leads to the decision to calibrate based on the flow field from 1.5D downstream in a zone of width 3D to also capture the expansion width of the far wake. It should be noted that this is typically the region of highest error between not only differing turbine representation methods, but also to measured data; the existing research has already demonstrated that accurately capturing the wake dynamics may require investigation of several different approaches to turbine modelling (Sandoval et al 2021). The central region of the wake is well calibrated, with increased r.m.s.…”
Section: Calibration Of Floris Wake Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%