2008
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2008.917544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling Thermal Process in a Resistive Element of a Fault Current Limiter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, the SFCL model intrinsically reacts to current magnitudes in each individual phase and does not have to be configured to operate at a specific time; this is a valuable refinement when compared to other models (such as [3], [10], [11], [13] and [14]), which may tend to overestimate the reduction in peak make fault current and lead to inaccurate transient results until the final SFCL resistance value is reached. The model used in this study is effective at estimating the peak make fault current reduction, yet it avoids the complexities of thermo-electric models such as those described in [15], [16] and [17]. Equation (1) describes the model used in the studies presented in this paper, where: R 0 is the maximum SFCL resistance value; is the time constant which determines how quickly the SFCL reaches R 0 ; and i SFCL (t) is the instantaneous phase current in the SFCL.…”
Section: Resistive Sfcl Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, the SFCL model intrinsically reacts to current magnitudes in each individual phase and does not have to be configured to operate at a specific time; this is a valuable refinement when compared to other models (such as [3], [10], [11], [13] and [14]), which may tend to overestimate the reduction in peak make fault current and lead to inaccurate transient results until the final SFCL resistance value is reached. The model used in this study is effective at estimating the peak make fault current reduction, yet it avoids the complexities of thermo-electric models such as those described in [15], [16] and [17]. Equation (1) describes the model used in the studies presented in this paper, where: R 0 is the maximum SFCL resistance value; is the time constant which determines how quickly the SFCL reaches R 0 ; and i SFCL (t) is the instantaneous phase current in the SFCL.…”
Section: Resistive Sfcl Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 5 illustrates that the total energy dissipated in the SFCL (at location A, for fault F1), due to ohmic heating, is reduced for higher values of SFCL resistance because of the significant reduction in fault current, as calculated by Equation (3) where t f is the time of fault occurrence and t c is the time when the fault is cleared. This is important because it will affect the length of the recovery time of a resistive SFCL [15]. Note that energy dissipation may be substantially lower if an impedance is placed in parallel with the SFCL [5] and external to the cryogenic environment, but this will also affect the current limitation properties [22].…”
Section: Non-fault Transients and Their Potential To Cause Sfcl Mal-omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that the current rating is based on the prospective temperature of the wire and the permissible time for which the temperature can be experienced, as dictated by I unit = (dT unit C v Volume unit ) / R unit t f , where dT unit is the temperature change and C v is the volumetric specific heat capacity of the superconductor. This assumes an adiabatic process but an alternative, non-adiabatic equation is derived in [4]. The required resistance rating of an SFCL can be obtained by connecting individual superconductor units in series; the current rating can be increased by connecting units in parallel, equivalent to increasing the cross-sectional area of the wire and thereby reducing the total resistance.…”
Section: Relationship Of Sfcl Power Dissipation To Minimum Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the resistance of an SFCL should be chosen to limit the fault current as much as possible. Not only does this benefit the electrical system through reduction in the potentially damaging effects of high fault currents, the primary purpose of the SFCL, but increasing the limitation of the fault current has a consequence of shortening the recovery time of the SFCL by reducing the energy dissipated in the resistance of the SFCL [4]. Furthermore, excessive heat dissipation may damage the SFCL and cause undue vaporization of the coolant [5], so increasing limitation is attractive from many perspectives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation