1997
DOI: 10.1139/x97-092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling thinning effects on ring width distribution in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda)

Abstract: Measurements were made on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) from permanent sample plots to study the effects of thinning on ring width distribution and to develop a ring width prediction model. Thinning significantly increased ring width over most of the tree bole, and its effects tended to persist over the 12 years since thinning. Significant regional variation in average ring width was evident, with average ring width tending to decrease from the Highlands, to the Coastal Plain, to the Piedmont. A ring width pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

14
48
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
14
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a stand, the dominant and co-dominant trees have usually a higher growth rate and more tapered stems than suppressed or intermediate trees, irrespective of stand density and site fertility (Larson 1963, Kozlowski 1971, Tasissa and Burkhart 1997. Similarly, after a moderate or heavy thinning, and especially if the thinning is done at an early enough stage of stand development, these dominant and co-dominant trees also show higher absolute thinning response compared to suppressed ones because of their improved growing conditions (Ruha and Varmola 1997, Pukkala et al 1998, Peltola et al 2002, Mäkinen and Isomäki 2004a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In a stand, the dominant and co-dominant trees have usually a higher growth rate and more tapered stems than suppressed or intermediate trees, irrespective of stand density and site fertility (Larson 1963, Kozlowski 1971, Tasissa and Burkhart 1997. Similarly, after a moderate or heavy thinning, and especially if the thinning is done at an early enough stage of stand development, these dominant and co-dominant trees also show higher absolute thinning response compared to suppressed ones because of their improved growing conditions (Ruha and Varmola 1997, Pukkala et al 1998, Peltola et al 2002, Mäkinen and Isomäki 2004a.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of how management, such as thinning, affects the properties of wood in tree stands, depends on thinning intensity and its type, tree species, the status of the tree in a stand and whether juvenile or mature wood is being formed (Olesen 1977, Kärkkäinen 1984, Moschler et al 1989, Tasissa and Burkhart 1997, Pape 1999a,b, Mörling 2002. In general, the radial growth and the proportion of early wood of conifers has been suggested to increase with increasing growth, whereas wood density, proportion of late wood and fibre length has been suggested to decrease (Hakkila 1966, Persson 1975, Olesen 1977, Zobel and van Buijtenen 1989, Barbour et al 1994, Lindström 1996, Zhang et al 1996, Tasissa and Burkhart 1997, Pape 1999a,b, Mäkinen et al 2002.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The second approach introduces an assumed correlation structure into a generalized least squares solution (Tasissa & Burkhart 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%