2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling time and spatial variability of degradation through gamma processes for structural reliability assessment

Abstract: The objective of this work is to propose a spatio-temporal random field for assessing the effect of spatial variability on the degradation process in structural reliability assessment. Our model extends the classical Gamma process which is usually developed for degradation temporal variability concerns to integrate spatial variability and heterogeneity issues. A log-normal distributed spatial random scale is then introduced in the Gamma process. Mathematical models for a structure degradation in space and time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, an interesting extension of the model that incorporates either the heterogeneity or the spatial variability in the modeling (Oumouni et al, 2019) will be the topic of further studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, an interesting extension of the model that incorporates either the heterogeneity or the spatial variability in the modeling (Oumouni et al, 2019) will be the topic of further studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due © 2021 Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering to the mathematical benefits of the Gamma process, many deterioration phenomena are modeled with a smaller computational cost. Further, failure probabilities are provided with analytic forms (Oumouni, Schoefs, & Castanier, 2019;Van Noortwijk, 2009;Wenocur, 1989). However, in many deterioration phenomena (corrosion of reinforced concrete with chloride propagation, crack growth process in materials due to fatigue), increments of the degradation are not independent, but each one depends on the current state and the increment of time (El Hajj, Schoefs, Castanier, & Yeung, 2017;Giorgio, Guida, & Pulcini, 2015;, so the degradation growth statistically depends on the current state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another well-established method in spatio-temporal modelling is the use of separable fields. Oumouni et. al.…”
Section: Random Field Modelling For Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the probabilistic distribution used to model time to failure and degradation process has large influence on the resulting reliability (Quesenberry, 1982, Rausand, 1998. The use of Leví process (especially Gamma) to simulate deterioration of components has been largely suggested (Williams et al, 1985, Pandey et al, 2005, Noortwijk et al, 2007, Amaya-Gómez et al, 2019, Oumouni et al, 2019. Main advantage of using Gamma distribution lays in the easier inclusion of time variation though the shape parameter, while keeping constant the scale parameter.…”
Section: Choice Of Probabilistic Distribution In Corrosion Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Main advantage of using Gamma distribution lays in the easier inclusion of time variation though the shape parameter, while keeping constant the scale parameter. However, a Gamma process has independent positive increments, which makes realizations monotonic and linearly increasing, thus a dataset of progressive increments of defect size is needed to model the degradation process where any non-linearity of corrosion processes, , any variation of the degradation rate and any dependency over operational parameters can be introduced by Bayesian updating whenever new observations are available (Pandey et al, 2005, Straub et al, 2007, Oumouni et al, 2019. The dataset available for this study does not provides increments of defect size in between inspections, but only pit sizes at failure, leading to the choice of a shock load type of distribution, as highlighted in the following sections.…”
Section: Choice Of Probabilistic Distribution In Corrosion Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%