2020
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-38-1203-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling total electron content derived from radio occultation measurements by COSMIC satellites over the African region

Abstract: Abstract. This study developed a model of total electron content (TEC) over the African region. The TEC data were obtained from radio occultation measurements done by the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) satellites. Data during geomagnetically quiet time (Kp < 3 and Dst > −20 nT) for the years 2008–2011 and 2013–2017 were binned according to local time, seasons, solar flux level, and geographic longitude and latitude. B splines were fitted to the binned dat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, rejection of data may make this number reduce further. The current study did not reject COSMIC TEC with horizontal smear >1500 km since Mungufeni et al (2020) analyzed COSMIC TEC data which were coincident with TEC estimated by ionosonde stations over South Africa, finding that, compared to measurements with horizontal smear >1500 km, some measurements with horizontal smear <1500 km were far from the linear least squares fitting line.…”
Section: Data Sourcescontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…Therefore, rejection of data may make this number reduce further. The current study did not reject COSMIC TEC with horizontal smear >1500 km since Mungufeni et al (2020) analyzed COSMIC TEC data which were coincident with TEC estimated by ionosonde stations over South Africa, finding that, compared to measurements with horizontal smear >1500 km, some measurements with horizontal smear <1500 km were far from the linear least squares fitting line.…”
Section: Data Sourcescontrasting
confidence: 69%