Modeling trophic dependencies and exchanges among insects’ bacterial symbionts in a host-simulated environment

Abstract

BackgroundIndividual organisms are linked to their communities and ecosystems via metabolic activities. Metabolic exchanges and co-dependencies have long been suggested to have a pivotal role in determining community structure. In phloem-feeding insects such metabolic interactions with bacteria enable complementation of their deprived nutrition. The phloem-feeding whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) harbors an obligatory symbiotic bacterium, as well as varying combinations of facultative symbionts. This well-defined bacterial community in B. tabaci serves here as a case study for a comprehensive and systematic survey of metabolic interactions within the bacterial community and their associations with documented occurrences of bacterial combinations. We first reconstructed the metabolic networks of five common B. tabaci symbionts genera (Portiera, Rickettsia, Hamiltonella, Cardinium and Wolbachia), and then used network analysis approaches to predict: (1) species-specific metabolic capacities in a simulated bacteriocyte-like environment; (2) metabolic capacities of the corresponding species’ combinations, and (3) dependencies of each species on different media components.ResultsThe predictions for metabolic capacities of the symbionts in the host environment were in general agreement with previously reported genome analyses, each focused on the single-species level. The analysis suggests several previously un-reported routes for complementary interactions and estimated the dependency of each symbiont in specific host metabolites. No clear association was detected between metabolic co-dependencies and co-occurrence patterns.ConclusionsThe analysis generated predictions for testable hypotheses of metabolic exchanges and co-dependencies in bacterial communities and by crossing them with co-occurrence profiles, contextualized interaction patterns into a wider ecological perspective.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12864-018-4786-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Modeling microbial communities from atrazine contaminated soils promotes the development of biostimulation solutions

“…New sequencing technologies allow now revealing the dynamics of community shifts and together with modeling approaches lay foundations for the educated design of community function [17]. Progress in sequencing technologies promotes the description of the bio-diversity and metabolic activity of microorganisms in ecological niches [18][19][20][21]. Parallel advancement of computational tools such as Genome-scale metabolic models (GSMM) and respective simulation algorithms such as Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) further enable in silico analysis of microbial interactions [19,20,22,23].…”

The microbiome of pest insects: it is not just bacteria

“…This phenomenon of regulating cell density has been reported as beneficial within biofilms, and has also been reported for the gut microbiome in mice and in tsetse flies (Thompson et al., ; Enomoto et al., ). Additionally, metabolic exchanges are important among various bacterial members associated with the insect hosts (Ankrah et al., ; Opatovsky et al., ). A nice example is the interaction described in ‘Nutrient provisioning by bacteria’, between the symbionts B. cicadellinicola and S. muelleri , that jointly provide essential nutrients to the glassy‐winged sharpshooter H. vitripennis (Wu et al., ).…”

Metage2Metabo: metabolic complementarity applied to genomes of large-scale microbiotas for the identification of keystone species

“…The network expansion algorithm computes the scope of a metabolic network from a description of the growth medium (seeds), that is, the family of metabolic compounds which are reachable according to a boolean abstraction of the network dynamics assuming that cycles cannot be self-activated. This algorithm has been widely used to analyse and refine metabolic networks [35,31,10,45,43], including for microbiota analysis [9,38,39,18]. As the scope ignores the stoichiometry of metabolites involved in reactions, it appears to be a good trade-off between the accuracy of metabolic predictions and the precision required for the input data.…”