2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.10.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling viscosity of moderate and light dead oils in the presence of complex aromatic structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nanocomposite polymer solution samples were prepared using different concentrations of the nanocomposite polymer (1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 g/L) at salinity of 30,000 ppm. These samples were subjected to viscosity analysis test (Mansour et al 2018;El Aily et al 2019). The viscosity measurements were taken at the reservoir temperature, atmospheric pressure and different shear rates.…”
Section: Solution Properties Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanocomposite polymer solution samples were prepared using different concentrations of the nanocomposite polymer (1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5 and 4 g/L) at salinity of 30,000 ppm. These samples were subjected to viscosity analysis test (Mansour et al 2018;El Aily et al 2019). The viscosity measurements were taken at the reservoir temperature, atmospheric pressure and different shear rates.…”
Section: Solution Properties Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of the correlation occurred by using a regression analysis that depends on the variable's nature of them. The regression analysis concept depends on fitting the independent variables to predict one dependent variable [16]. Non-linear multiple regression analysis explains the relations between the dependent variables and independent variables [37].…”
Section: Modification Of Wilson Equation (K-values)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of such experimental analysis, the bubble point pressure may be estimated by the equation of state, empirical correlations or K-values [14]. PVT computation methods are used for the following reasons: (i) insufficient sample volume (ii) cost reduction (iii), not representative samples (iv) unavailable lab measurements [15][16][17]. Most popular bubble point pressure correlations informed in the literature are involved in this paper as shown in Appendix A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average error of -1.83% have been recorded during testing for proposed correlation. Their correlation is covering solution gas to oil ratio (Rs) within the range of 20 to 2070 scf/STB, oil gravity of 16 to 58°API, pressure range of 0 to 5250 and temperature of 70 to 295°F (Beggs and Robinson, 1975;El Aily et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All aforementioned correlations developed from crude oil, which has compositional differences with gas condensate fluid composition. Moreover, they are direct function of dead oil viscosity, which is one of the most unreliable properties to be predicted by correlations due to the large effect that oil type (paraffinicity, aromaticity and asphaltene content) has on viscosity (Aily et al, 2019;Whitson et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%