2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3839(02)00043-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling wave runup with depth-integrated equations

Abstract: In this paper, a moving boundary technique is developed to investigate wave runup and rundown with depth-integrated equations. Highly nonlinear and weakly dispersive equations are solved using a high-order finite difference scheme. An eddy viscosity model is adopted for wave breaking so as to investigate breaking wave runup. The moving boundary technique utilizes linear extrapolation through the wet -dry boundary and into the dry region. Nonbreaking and breaking solitary wave runup is accurately predicted by t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

15
222
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 362 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
15
222
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The NDS simulation also needs to employ an implicit scheme to stably calculate the dispersion while the NLL employs an explicit scheme. If you consider a practical application for tsunami early warning, developing a more efficient method to solve the NDS equations on supercomputers is necessary [e.g., Lynett et al, 2002;Saito and Furumura, 2009;Kirby et al, 2012;Shi et al, 2012;Oishi et al, 2013]. For this purpose, it is a good compromise to use the DSP equations for source estimation and propagation across the ocean, and to use the NLL equations for tsunami and inundation predictions near the coast.…”
Section: Discussion On Tsunami Waveform Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The NDS simulation also needs to employ an implicit scheme to stably calculate the dispersion while the NLL employs an explicit scheme. If you consider a practical application for tsunami early warning, developing a more efficient method to solve the NDS equations on supercomputers is necessary [e.g., Lynett et al, 2002;Saito and Furumura, 2009;Kirby et al, 2012;Shi et al, 2012;Oishi et al, 2013]. For this purpose, it is a good compromise to use the DSP equations for source estimation and propagation across the ocean, and to use the NLL equations for tsunami and inundation predictions near the coast.…”
Section: Discussion On Tsunami Waveform Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is desirable to estimate the tsunami source that provides all the details of the tsunami waveforms and runup. To reproduce all the data sets perfectly, it is also important to use more fine scale topography data (e.g., Baba et al, 2014], to adjust optimal friction parameter and to examine the difference among friction models [e.g., Lynett et al, 2002;Shi et al, 2012].…”
Section: Discussion On Tsunami Waveform Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Method of Splitting Tsunami (MOST) model has been verified with various bench marking tests and laboratory experiments (Synolaiks et al, 2008). Coulwave (Lynett et al, 2002) solves a set of Boussinesq equations and includes bottom friction effects with a high-order finite-volume method. Coulwave has been validated with fundamental benchmark problems for runup using field data and experimental data (Lynett et al, 2002;Lynett and Liu, 2005;Park et al, 2013).…”
Section: Numerical Model Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coulwave (Lynett et al, 2002) solves a set of Boussinesq equations and includes bottom friction effects with a high-order finite-volume method. Coulwave has been validated with fundamental benchmark problems for runup using field data and experimental data (Lynett et al, 2002;Lynett and Liu, 2005;Park et al, 2013). ADCIRC (Luettich and Westerink, 2004) solves the non-linear shallow equation using a finite element method and is widely utilized for hurricane wave inundation problems when coupled with SWAN.…”
Section: Numerical Model Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the impulsive nature of the rock-slide water impact, the wave evolution becomes dispersive. Traditional tsunami models based on the shallow water formulation (e.g., Titov and Synolakis, 1995;Imamura, 1996;Titov and Synolakis, 1997;LeVeque and George, 2008) do not include dispersion, and dispersive wave models such as those based on the Boussinesq formulation (Madsen and Sørensen, 1992;Nwogu, 1993;Wei et al, 1995;Lynett et al, 2002;Madsen et al, 2003) constitute better alternatives. New Boussinesq models have been formulated using the shock-capturing approximate Riemann solvers in combination with TVD (total variation diminishing limiters, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%