2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modeling word-of-mouth usage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
109
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
8
109
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Past research efforts have studied various word-of-mouth (WOM) issues from identifying antecedents of WOM ( Rossi, 2008;Mazzarol, Sweeney, & Soutar, 2007) and characteristics of WOM speakers and listeners (Lee & Youn, 2009;Martin & Lueg, 2013) to platforms that influence WOM effects (Lee & Youn, 2009;Martin & Lueg, 2013). In particular, researchers have called for more research in investigating the antecedents of WOM (Mazzarol et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past research efforts have studied various word-of-mouth (WOM) issues from identifying antecedents of WOM ( Rossi, 2008;Mazzarol, Sweeney, & Soutar, 2007) and characteristics of WOM speakers and listeners (Lee & Youn, 2009;Martin & Lueg, 2013) to platforms that influence WOM effects (Lee & Youn, 2009;Martin & Lueg, 2013). In particular, researchers have called for more research in investigating the antecedents of WOM (Mazzarol et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the positive and negative effects of WoM on the consumer purchase decisions seem consolidated in the literature (e.g., Maxham 2001), even if there is some debate about how and when the information individuals acquire from WoM is effectively employed (Sweeneyet al 2008). It seems also established in the literature the importance of the reliability of information sources -and thus social proximity and the strength of ties -both for the consumer's decision-making as to the spread of new products (De Matos andRossi 2008, Martin andLueg 2013). In addition, social networks are frequently considered a suitable environment for the study of WoM, in both the consumer decision process and the dynamics of social "contagion" (Doyle 2007, Rogers 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems evident that the task of deciding with which access provider to hire service is definitely not an easy one, despite quite common and important, and subject to elevated risk of error. Objectively measuring the direct effects of word-of-mouth in markets is a long time problem (Martin and Lueg 2013). On top of that, anecdotal evidence suggests that some particular cultural and institutional circumstances of countries/regions may strengthen the influence of WoM and the social network in the hiring decision.…”
Section: Figure 1 -Inverse Herfindahl-hirschman Index For Mobile Accementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, during their stay at the destination, before going to any restaurant, travelers seek comments and reviews from other consumers about that particular restaurant, which then decisively influences their choice (Sen & Lerman, 2007;Chu & Kamal, 2008;Lee, Park & Han, 2008;Doh & Hwang, 2009;Lee & Youn, 2009;Martin & Lueg, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%