2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2005.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling a geo-composite cell using discrete analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These experiments only permitted a limited number of variations of both the geometries and impact energies to be studied, due to their complexity. Furthermore, the numerical modelling developed to study ground reinforced embankments (Carotti et al, 2000;Castiglia, 2000;Vecchiotti, 2003, 2006;Bertrand et al, 2005;Bertrand, 2006;Lambert et al, 2007Lambert et al, , 2008Peila et al, 2007;Plassiard et al, 2008) has generally been limited to the back-analysis of full-scale tests and these researches have not provided a general design procedure for this type of protection work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experiments only permitted a limited number of variations of both the geometries and impact energies to be studied, due to their complexity. Furthermore, the numerical modelling developed to study ground reinforced embankments (Carotti et al, 2000;Castiglia, 2000;Vecchiotti, 2003, 2006;Bertrand et al, 2005;Bertrand, 2006;Lambert et al, 2007Lambert et al, , 2008Peila et al, 2007;Plassiard et al, 2008) has generally been limited to the back-analysis of full-scale tests and these researches have not provided a general design procedure for this type of protection work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, experimental and numerical studies at the geocell scale (Bertrand et al, 2005;Lambert et al, 2009Lambert et al, , 2011 and at the scale of an assembly of geocells were conducted (Bourrier et al, 2011;Dimnet el al., 2013;Heymann et al, 2010Heymann et al, , 2011. The experimental facet of this study emphasized instrumentation monitoring, to investigate the structure's response and validate the derived numerical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boulder radius R b varies from R m to 5 R m . The influence of particle shape is also explored by defining two different soil samples composed of either spherical particles or elongated particles modeled by indivisible assemblies of spherical particles called clump particles, which can realistically model the shape of soil rocks (Bertrand et al, 2006;Deluzarche and Cambou, 2006;Bourrier et al, 2008a). The soil sample generation procedure leads to soil porosity values of 0.204 for spherical particles and 0.171 for clump particles.…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Of Impacts Using the Discrete Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%