2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-0073-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling a sustainable requalification problem by analytic hierarchy process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kurek et al ( 2021 ) integrated the AHP with statistic methods as Principal component analysis for to evaluate the local competitiveness. Racioppi et al ( 2015 ) analysed a complex problem for the territory requalification to improve the attractiveness with the use of AHP. Hsieh et al ( 2008 ) use the ANP method to evaluate the quality of services taking into account their interdependence.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kurek et al ( 2021 ) integrated the AHP with statistic methods as Principal component analysis for to evaluate the local competitiveness. Racioppi et al ( 2015 ) analysed a complex problem for the territory requalification to improve the attractiveness with the use of AHP. Hsieh et al ( 2008 ) use the ANP method to evaluate the quality of services taking into account their interdependence.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the variations in population, social environments, and architectural quality, which had been included in the AHP as criteria, implied people's broadened recognition of living environments and investment portfolios in 2050. Racioppi et al [26] applied the AHP to find the best alternative for improving tourist accommodation facilities and reaching the goal of energy efficiency and reduced energy consumption. To find the best alternative, total weights for every alternative based upon its criteria for the benefit hierarchy were counted respectively, as were the total weights for every alternative based upon its criteria for the cost (risk) hierarchy.…”
Section: Ahpmentioning
confidence: 99%