Modelling as a tool to redesign livestock farming systems: a literature review

Abstract

Livestock farming has recently come under close scrutiny, in response especially to environmental issues. Farmers are encouraged to redesign their livestock farming systems in depth to improve their sustainability. Assuming that modelling can be a relevant tool to address such systemic changes, we sought to answer the following question: 'How can livestock farming systems be modelled to help farmers redesign their whole farming systems?' To this end, we made a literature review of the models of livestock farming systems published from 2000 to mid-2009 (n 5 79). We used an analysis grid based on three considerations: (i) system definition, (ii) the intended use of the model and (iii) the way in which farmers' decision-making processes were represented and how agricultural experts and farmers were involved in the modelling processes. Consistent rationales in approaches to supporting changes in livestock farming were identified in three different groups of models, covering 83% of the whole set. These could be defined according to (i) the way in which farmers' decisions were represented and (ii) the model's type of contribution to supporting changes. The first type gathered models that dynamically simulated the system according to different management options; the farmers' decision-making processes are assumed to consist in choosing certain values for management factors. Such models allow long-term simulations and endorse different disciplinary viewpoints, but the farmers are weakly involved in their design. Models of the second type can indicate the best combination of farm activities under given constraints, provided the farmers' objectives are profit maximisation. However, when used to support redesigning processes, they address neither how to implement the optimal solution nor its long-term consequences. Models of the third type enable users to dynamically simulate different options for the farming system, the management of which is assumed to be planned according to the farmers' general objectives. Although more comprehensive, these models do not easily integrate different disciplinary viewpoints and different subsystems, which limits their usefulness as support tools for redesigning processes. Finally, we concluded about what specific requirements should be for modelling approaches if farmers were to be supported in redesigning their whole livestock farming systems using models.Keywords: livestock farming systems, modelling, support tools, innovative process, redesign ImplicationsThis review analyses the strengths and weaknesses of published models of livestock farming systems to support farmers in redesigning their whole systems. It is a first step towards building more efficient tools to help farmers to switch towards more sustainable livestock farming systems. IntroductionLivestock farming has recently come under close scrutiny, in response especially to environmental issues (Steinfeld et al., 2006). There is increasing societal pressure for more sustainable livestock practices prompting, for example, the E...

Designing agroecological transitions; A review

“…The second type of analysis is performed through a participatory approach aiming to collectively construct conceptual representations of the functioning of farming systems, supply chains and natural resource management and their interactions. To perform this co-construction, we use methods for collective construction of cognitive maps, such as those representing farming system functioning (Gouttenoire et al 2011), natural resource management at the local level (Etienne et al 2008) and social-ecological system functioning (Sibertin-Blanc et al 2011). The final objective of this step is to compare the social interactions that determine the functioning of local agriculture and natural resource management mapped by both approaches and, ultimately, for stakeholders and researchers to build them into a new shared representation.…”

Development of a broadened cognitive mapping approach for analysing systems of practices in social–ecological systems

“…This has led various authors to highlight the need for incorporating social aspects into DSS (Edwards-Jones, 2006;Gouttenoire et al, 2011). In order to improve decision-making in social-ecological systems, greater understanding is needed of the knowledge used by managers (such as farmers) in managing their systems (Girard and Hubert, 1999).…”

Handbook of Operations Research in Agriculture and the Agri-Food Industry

“…In Australia, Moloney and Hearne (2009) showed that the replacement of domestic livestock with native alternatives, or even mixed grazing, is economically and environmentally viable. The interested reader can find a review of optimisation and simulation models of livestock farming systems with emphasis in sustainability in Gouttenoire et al (2011).…”