2011
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling behavioural contagion

Abstract: The last decade has seen much work on quantitative understanding of human behaviour, with online social interaction offering the possibility of more precise measurement of behavioural phenomena than was previously possible. A parsimonious model is proposed that incorporates several observed features of behavioural contagion not seen in existing epidemic model schemes, leading to metastable behavioural dynamics.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the information spreading in online social networks should be much different from the epidemic spreading or the off-line information spreading at the microscopic or macroscopic level. To date, some models that describe information spreading process have been presented [18,19], but there is still not a clear picture on this issue. In 2010, Centola conducted an experiment of behavior spreading in online social networks; although behavior and information are different disseminules, we believe they share some similar properties and the behavior spreading process will make use of the information spreading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the information spreading in online social networks should be much different from the epidemic spreading or the off-line information spreading at the microscopic or macroscopic level. To date, some models that describe information spreading process have been presented [18,19], but there is still not a clear picture on this issue. In 2010, Centola conducted an experiment of behavior spreading in online social networks; although behavior and information are different disseminules, we believe they share some similar properties and the behavior spreading process will make use of the information spreading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many social networks exhibit clustering, and so the status of one neighbour v of u is likely to be correlated to the status of another neighbour w. This assumptions of independence of neighbours breaks down. For this case, ad hoc approaches are able to make some progress [35]. However, in particular limits analytic results are possible.…”
Section: Triangle-based Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is rarely the case because it is natural for people to protect themselves when realizing disease risks (Eames, Tilston, Brooks-Pollock, & Edmunds, 2012;Ferguson, 2007). To improve, there has been much recent interest in modeling two diffusion processes in an epidemic, either a behavior-disease diffusion (House, 2011;Mao & Bian, 2011;Vardavas, Breban, & Blower, 2007), or an information (awareness)-disease diffusion (Funk, Gilad, Watkins, & Jansen, 2009;Kiss, Cassell, Recker, & Simon, 2010). These 'dual-diffusion' models have made a remarkable progress toward the reality, but none of them consider all the three diffusion processes together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%