2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling branch characteristics of Norway spruce from wide spacings in Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
51
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
13
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the base of the living crown is above the first logs, then the models will not provide information about past branch diameter and knot size in the most valuable part of the tree. Previous studies have shown that the largest branches are found above the crown base (Mäkinen et al 2003, Garber and Maguire 2005, Hein et al 2007), suggesting that estimates of current maximum branch diameter provide an approximate upper limit to past maximum branch diameters. Observations of knot diameters along the stem of Scots pine (Moberg 1999) are broadly consistent with this supposition; knot sizes remained more or less constant between the base of the crown and the butt region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the base of the living crown is above the first logs, then the models will not provide information about past branch diameter and knot size in the most valuable part of the tree. Previous studies have shown that the largest branches are found above the crown base (Mäkinen et al 2003, Garber and Maguire 2005, Hein et al 2007), suggesting that estimates of current maximum branch diameter provide an approximate upper limit to past maximum branch diameters. Observations of knot diameters along the stem of Scots pine (Moberg 1999) are broadly consistent with this supposition; knot sizes remained more or less constant between the base of the crown and the butt region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Branch diameter increases with distance below the tree apex, although for all but trees in young stands, the greatest diameter typically occurs above the crown base (Mäkinen et al 2003, Garber and Maguire 2005, Weiskittel et al 2010. Whorl level models also indicate that maximum branch diameter increases with tree characteristics representative of tree size and growing space, such as diameter at breast height (DBH) crown width, tree height, and tree spacing (Garber and Maguire 2005, Hein et al 2007, Benjamin et al 2009, Weiskittel et al 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuuluvainen 1988, Kantola and Mäkelä 2004, Hein et al 2007). However, in our comparison, spherical trees and conical trees were growing side by side under the same management regime and the same soil conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main measures regulating branch development, such as artificial pruning [8,18] and stand density control [16,17,[19][20][21], have been used in practice for a long time. Planting density may have no effect on early bud formation, but it does influence subsequent growth and persistence of branches, which then affects branch occlusion [21][22][23]. Hence, proper planting density is important for the improvement of timber quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%