2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12469-019-00203-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling bus bunching under variable transit demand using cellular automata

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These facts obviously hinder country's investment attractiveness, ease of doing business and free market concept. Lack of investments flow seriously damages growth potential compared to the level a country could reach, had there been a lower level of corruption (Chiabaut and Barcet, 2019;Nguyen et al, 2019;Bešinović and Goverde, 2019;Enayatollahi et al, 2019;Mohri and Akbarzadeh, 2019;Sun and Apland, 2019;Jevinger and Persson, 2019;Czioska et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These facts obviously hinder country's investment attractiveness, ease of doing business and free market concept. Lack of investments flow seriously damages growth potential compared to the level a country could reach, had there been a lower level of corruption (Chiabaut and Barcet, 2019;Nguyen et al, 2019;Bešinović and Goverde, 2019;Enayatollahi et al, 2019;Mohri and Akbarzadeh, 2019;Sun and Apland, 2019;Jevinger and Persson, 2019;Czioska et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delgado et al (2012) estimate that boarding limits can foster the benefits of holding strategies when applied simultaneously, particularly in the case of highfrequency and high-demand services, requiring fewer and shorter holding times to restore service regularity and travel comfort. Boarding limits implemented as a sole (isolated) measure were also found to be effective in reducing headway variability and improving travel times (Zhao et al 2016;Enayatollahi et al 2019). Saw et al (2019) conclude that noboarding policies perform favorably in mitigating the bus bunching when compared against holding strategies in busy periods, but contrarily-backfire during low-demand periods (by imposing excessive waiting times) when holding is a more advantageous solution.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…( 2021 ) Feedback loop based on real-time crowding information Extended towards multiple-origins bus operation Enayatollahi et al. ( 2019 ) Cellular automata Headway-based bunching index is proposed Moreira-Matias et al. ( 2016 ) Automatic control framework using a combination of various machine learning methods Case Study for Porto (Portugal) over a period of 1 year Nguyen et al.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%