2014
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2014.948503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling coastal water waves using a depth-integrated, non-hydrostatic model with shock-capturing ability

Abstract: This paper presents a depth-integrated, non-hydrostatic model for coastal water waves. The shock-capturing ability of this model is its most attractive aspect and is essential for computation of energetic breaking waves and wet-dry fronts. The model is solved in a fraction step manner, where the total pressure is decomposed into hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic parts. The hydrostatic pressure component is integrated explicitly in the framework of the finite volume method, whereas most of the existing models use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It represents the first application of a finite element based discretisation method for multi-layer non-hydrostatic modelling based upon the approach of Stelling and Zijlema (2003) in coastal and ocean domains. In the restricted case of depth-integrated applications (a single layer in our model) which has been adopted extensively for nonhydrostatic studies (Walters, 2005;Yamazaki et al, 2009;Wei and Jia, 2014;Fang et al, 2015), this work represents the first application of the discontinuous Galerkin finite element (DG-FE) method. More generally, we believe this work also represents one of the first demonstrations of a multi-layer approach combined with an unstructured mesh in the horizontal.…”
Section: And Thementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It represents the first application of a finite element based discretisation method for multi-layer non-hydrostatic modelling based upon the approach of Stelling and Zijlema (2003) in coastal and ocean domains. In the restricted case of depth-integrated applications (a single layer in our model) which has been adopted extensively for nonhydrostatic studies (Walters, 2005;Yamazaki et al, 2009;Wei and Jia, 2014;Fang et al, 2015), this work represents the first application of the discontinuous Galerkin finite element (DG-FE) method. More generally, we believe this work also represents one of the first demonstrations of a multi-layer approach combined with an unstructured mesh in the horizontal.…”
Section: And Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sketch of the experimental set-up may be found in (Fang et al, 2015), along with details of the six transects along which free-surface elevations are recorded and compared against our numerical results.…”
Section: Wave Propagation Over An Elliptical Shoalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summing all Eqs. (24) at the end of the CP problem, we get ( ) ( ) ). This means that the non-hydrostatic step does not affect the global mass balances.…”
Section: Model Properties Preservation Of the Local And Global Mass Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22,23 Only a few non-hydrostatic models are equipped with this shock-capturing feature. 18,24,25 In the NLSWEs applications involving fast transitions between wet and dry surfaces, e.g., coastal flooding and run-up of tsunamis, an accurate modeling of wetting/drying (WD) processes plays an important role. Several WD numerical techniques have been proposed, [26][27][28] but generally these are affected by several drawbacks, e.g., the mass imbalance and the high computational costs due to additional relationships to include in the numerical procedure at the transition wet/dry surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous shock-capturing procedures, in the framework of the Finite Volumes (FV), Finite Elements (FE) and Finite Differences (FD) schemes, have been proposed for the solution of the hydrostatic NLSWEs [22,23]. Only a few non-hydrostatic models are equipped with this shock-capturing feature [18,24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%