2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling concentration–analgesia relationships for morphine to evaluate experimental pain models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect was delayed, and a model with an effect compartment with the equilibration half time fixed to 0.5 hours (Bouw et al, 2000; Sverrisdottir et al, 2014) was statistically superior to a model with an equilibration half time fixed to 0.28 hours (P = 0.014) (Inturrisi and Colburn, 1986), or a model without an effect compartment (P = 0.026). A model with only morphine concentrations linked to analgesia was superior to models with M6G concentrations (P < 0.001), or a combination of morphine and M6G concentrations (P < 0.001) linked to effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The effect was delayed, and a model with an effect compartment with the equilibration half time fixed to 0.5 hours (Bouw et al, 2000; Sverrisdottir et al, 2014) was statistically superior to a model with an equilibration half time fixed to 0.28 hours (P = 0.014) (Inturrisi and Colburn, 1986), or a model without an effect compartment (P = 0.026). A model with only morphine concentrations linked to analgesia was superior to models with M6G concentrations (P < 0.001), or a combination of morphine and M6G concentrations (P < 0.001) linked to effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies with morphine and other opioids in experimental pain settings have demonstrated the importance of detecting placebo effect (Juul et al, 2014; Ravn et al, 2014; Sverrisdottir et al, 2014), which is generally only possible in an experimental pain setting. These studies showed that it is essential to understand the placebo response and the changes in baseline over time in order to identify the true drug effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 For human studies of the thermal pain stimulus response, the primary outcome was the area under the pain intensityestimulus temperature curve; the study was powered to detect a 12% difference in this area between postpartum and control groups, an effect size observed with pharmacological interventions of approved analgesics. 23 For capsaicin-evoked hypersensitivity, the primary outcome was the area of hyperalgesia; the study was powered to detect a 33% difference in this area between groups, an effect size observed with pharmacological interventions of approved analgesics. 24,25 The primary outcome for the CPM study was the strength of CPM; the study was powered to detect a difference of 55% in CPM strength between groups.…”
Section: Primary Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All females were on hormone-based contraceptives and tested negative for pregnancy before administration of study medication. Other end-points from the study have been published previously [11][12][13][14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%