2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68198-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling contaminant transport in fly ash–bentonite composite landfill liner: mechanism of different types of ions

Abstract: Generated hazardous or toxic waste posses a serious threat if dumped into ponds or low lying areas which leads to contamination, this necessitates the effective landfill liner system. Mainly compacted clayey soils are used as an engineered barrier. Recently, composite materials have gained popularity as landfill liner materials, including the use of waste materials amended with low permeable soils. Though, studies on the composite optimum mix and its corresponding thickness are very scarce. Here, we evaluated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was observed in Figure 4 that predicted values were lower than the measured values. Also, there was a sharp decrease in nitrate concentrations at 0.561ppm and 0.098 at a distance of 1.8m but slight decreases was observed at different distances and this could be attributed to soil type, adsorption or dispersion in the soil [1]. The correlation coefficient r of the predicted model and measured values P1, P2 were found to be 0.894 and 0.484 respectively.…”
Section: -3-comparison Of Modified Notodarmojo and Existing Notodarmojo Model With The Average Measured Valuesmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was observed in Figure 4 that predicted values were lower than the measured values. Also, there was a sharp decrease in nitrate concentrations at 0.561ppm and 0.098 at a distance of 1.8m but slight decreases was observed at different distances and this could be attributed to soil type, adsorption or dispersion in the soil [1]. The correlation coefficient r of the predicted model and measured values P1, P2 were found to be 0.894 and 0.484 respectively.…”
Section: -3-comparison Of Modified Notodarmojo and Existing Notodarmojo Model With The Average Measured Valuesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It was observed in Figure 9 that predicted values were lower than the measured values. Also, there was a sharp decrease in nitrate concentrations at 0.682 ppm, 0.165 ppm for M and P1 respectively at a distance of 1.8 m. But there were slight decreases at different distances which this could be attributed to soil type, adsorption or dispersion in the soil [1]. Also, the correlation coefficient r of the modified model P1 was 0.769 while the experimental data fitted in existing model P2 was 0.620.…”
Section: -3-comparison Of Modified Notodarmojo and Existing Notodarmojo Model With The Average Measured Valuesmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, finite difference methods for solving the unsteady and steady state problems are provided. Finite difference method has been shown to be powerful for solving various problems [31,32,33,34,35], which also include mathematical chemistry areas [36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%