2016
DOI: 10.1127/fal/2015/0736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling daily water level fluctuations of Lake Van (Eastern Turkey) using Artificial Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Empirical evidence that is not entirely conclusive, since in direct comparison with the work of Dogan et al [31] and Lake Van, we see that the model based on neural networks of this latter is superior, since it obtains a lower MSE, in this case of 0.0012. The set of training data includes only 560 observations, for the 8036 observations used by Dogan et al [31]. In this regard, we conclude that the best way to proceed is from daily data on water levels in the reservoir.…”
Section: Exploration Of Forecasting Techniquescontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Empirical evidence that is not entirely conclusive, since in direct comparison with the work of Dogan et al [31] and Lake Van, we see that the model based on neural networks of this latter is superior, since it obtains a lower MSE, in this case of 0.0012. The set of training data includes only 560 observations, for the 8036 observations used by Dogan et al [31]. In this regard, we conclude that the best way to proceed is from daily data on water levels in the reservoir.…”
Section: Exploration Of Forecasting Techniquescontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…We emphasize this research by Dogan et al [31], especially through the procedure, which has proved to be especially interesting and unmarked with the rest we have seen. It captures data from October 1975 to December 2011.…”
Section: Exploration Of Forecasting Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of the analysis were compared using the mean square error (MSE) and R 2 coefficient of determination, and it was stated that the FFNN algorithm model performed better than the RBFNN algorithm model. According to the estimation results obtained with this study, it was concluded that there will be a decrease in the water level of Lake Van in the future, therefore, the increase of water in the rapidly developing and dense settlements around the coast of Lake Van will not become a threat (Doğan et al, 2016). In another study, using daily flow values in the state of Pennsylvania, the Juniata River, which has an 8687 km 2 drainage area without any dam in its basin, was selected by black-box modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Lake Van is the largest body of water in Turkey with a total area of 3,750 km 2 and the depth of the lake reaches up to 450 meters (Doğan et al, 2016). The eastern part of the lake is in the territory of Van province, while the western part of the lake is in the territory of Bitlis province.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%