2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1320613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Deposit Insurance Scheme Losses in a Basel 2 Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A different approach, somewhat standing between the previous ones, based on the capital at risk reported by banks in their financial statements, is provided by the Symbol model of De Lisa et al (2011). This approach inverts the Vasicek model Basel II formula (Vasicek, 1984) so to obtain, for each bank, the probability of default that corresponds to the amount of regulatory capital set aside for the coverage of financial risks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different approach, somewhat standing between the previous ones, based on the capital at risk reported by banks in their financial statements, is provided by the Symbol model of De Lisa et al (2011). This approach inverts the Vasicek model Basel II formula (Vasicek, 1984) so to obtain, for each bank, the probability of default that corresponds to the amount of regulatory capital set aside for the coverage of financial risks.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors put emphasis on the necessity to link the amount of funds to the DPS loss distribution. 31,32 Coverage ratio…”
Section: Financial Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SYMBOL is a statistical tool estimating losses deriving from bank defaults, explicitly linking Basel capital requirements to the other key tools of the banking safety net, i.e. Deposit Guarantee Schemes, and bank Resolution Funds (De Lisa et al 2011). This tool has been used by Commission Services to prepare various Impact Assessments of European Commission (EC) regulatory proposals to enhance financial stability and prevent future crises (Capital Requirement Directive Proposal, Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive and Financial Transactions Tax).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The choice of the 50 % correlation is based on (Sironi and Zazzara 2004). A discussion and a sensitivity check on this assumption can be found in (De Lisa et al 2011). where N is the normal probability function and N −1 (α i, j ) are correlated normal random shocks, and I O P D i is the average implied obligors probability of default estimated for each bank in step 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation