2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2021.101572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling drying kinetics of paddy in swirling fluidized bed dryer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To validate the predictability of the ANN model, standard statistical parameters like root mean square error (RMSE), Mean absolute error (MAE), and Coefficient of determination (R 2 ) were employed to verify the accuracy of the prediction [31]. After using various ANN topologies to the testing data, it was found that the network with TANSIGMOID -TANSIGMOID activation function combinations and 5 neurons in the input hidden layer gave the best result with maximum values of R 2 , RMSE, and MAE of 0.9976, 0.0360, and 0.0034 were in accordance with the range reported in literature, R 2 ranged from 0.981 to 0.999, RMSE ranged from 0.0333 to 0.1475 and MAE ranged from 0.05318 to 0.0088 [19,32].…”
Section: Moisture Ratio Processing By Ann Predictive Modelingsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To validate the predictability of the ANN model, standard statistical parameters like root mean square error (RMSE), Mean absolute error (MAE), and Coefficient of determination (R 2 ) were employed to verify the accuracy of the prediction [31]. After using various ANN topologies to the testing data, it was found that the network with TANSIGMOID -TANSIGMOID activation function combinations and 5 neurons in the input hidden layer gave the best result with maximum values of R 2 , RMSE, and MAE of 0.9976, 0.0360, and 0.0034 were in accordance with the range reported in literature, R 2 ranged from 0.981 to 0.999, RMSE ranged from 0.0333 to 0.1475 and MAE ranged from 0.05318 to 0.0088 [19,32].…”
Section: Moisture Ratio Processing By Ann Predictive Modelingsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The number of processing elements and iterations (epoch) for each topology was recorded. After applying different ANN topologies to the testing data, it was found that the network with TANSIGMOID -TANSIGMOID activation function combinations and 9 neurons in the input hidden layer produced the best results, with R 2 , RMSE, and MAE values of 0.9696, 0.0916, and 0.0028 were in accordance with the range reported in literature, R 2 ranged from 0.981 to 0.999, RMSE ranged from 0.0333 to 0.1475 and MAE ranged from 0.05318 to 0.0088 [19,32].…”
Section: Drying Rate Processing By Ann Predictive Modelingsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…According to Mohapatra and Rao [22], coefficients of determination (R 2 ) higher than 90% are satisfactory in the drying process. Sitorus et al [33] used the same parameters to choose the best model that fitted the kinetic drying of paddy in a fluidized bed. Madamba et al [34] reported that this parameter alone does not constitute a good index for the selection of nonlinear models.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model with the highest R 2 and lowest RMSE and X 2 was chosen as the best model to fit the experimental data. Numerous researchers used the evaluation criteria of the highest R 2 and the lowest RMSE and X 2 (Kingsly and Singh 2007;Roberts et al 2008;Phanphanich and Mani 2010;Erbay and Icier 2010;Yun et al 2013;Manikantan et al 2014;Sundaram et al 2016;Sadaka and Atungulu 2018;Owusu-Sekyere et al 2021;Sitorus et al 2021). The RMSE and X 2 were calculated according to Eqs.…”
Section: Model Fitting To the Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%