2009
DOI: 10.1108/03321640910959035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling eddy currents in thin shields

Abstract: Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to present a simplified rigorous mathematical formulation of the problem of electric currents induced in thin shields with holes yielding more efficient numerical computations with respect to available methods. Design/methodology/approach-A surface integral equation satisfied by the current density was constructed, which is, subsequently, represented at any point by linear combinations of novel vector basis functions only associated with the interior nodes of the discretiza… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Obviously, SLAE obtained in [17] by the Galerkin method is also degenerate, but the authors do not write about this. -The approach proposed in this article can be generalized to other types of boundary secondary sources, for example, on sources such as a simple layer of magnetization currents [20][21][22]. However, when deriving a SLAE for this type of sources, the law of total current should be applied.…”
Section: Comparison Of a Constructed Numerical Model With Existing Apmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, SLAE obtained in [17] by the Galerkin method is also degenerate, but the authors do not write about this. -The approach proposed in this article can be generalized to other types of boundary secondary sources, for example, on sources such as a simple layer of magnetization currents [20][21][22]. However, when deriving a SLAE for this type of sources, the law of total current should be applied.…”
Section: Comparison Of a Constructed Numerical Model With Existing Apmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [4], this problem is circumvented by introducing an alternative formulation whose number of unknowns is roughly the same but it requires an additional factorization of a full matrix. A heuristic approach to solve the problem arising when multiply connected conductors are present-based on adding one specialized basis function for each hole-has been proposed in [6]. Unfortunately, this technique does not work with conductors of arbitrary topology, since-as it becomes clear at the end of this paper-it fails for surfaces with non-vanishing genus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generators due to holes may be easily found using the non-local basis functions used in[6] since H = GN holds, where the column of matrix N store the coefficients of the non-local basis functions of[6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These formulations are not suitable for models with complex topology, e.g., shells with holes or bulk domains with cavities. Surface integral equation methods for thin shell problems with non-simply connected domains have been presented [7]- [9]. In particular, the integral method proposed in [7] is advantageous since unknowns are related to nodes and holes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%