2019
DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/m623d
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling electroglottographic data with wavegrams and generalised additive mixed models

Abstract: While electrogloography is a pracঞcal and safe technique for obtaining arঞculatory data on voicing, staঞsঞcal analysis of the signal it returns poses a few challenges given the highly dimensional nature of the signal. The wavegram has been proposed as a visualisaঞon method which overcomes the limitaঞons of reducing the complex electrogloographic signal to a single measure like the contact quoঞent. This paper introduces a method for modelling dynamic electrogloographic data based on the wavegram using generalis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied smooth functions with thin plate basis splines (bs = "tp") to "Year" by "Species" and "Delta Outflow" by "Species," and "Species" was included as a linear fixed effect. Finally, we printed generalized additive model results in tabular format and generated plots of yearly COG point estimates, 95% confidence intervals around the point estimates, the fit trendline and 95% confidence interval by species from the generalized additive model, and the spline effect of Delta outflow in million-acre feet on COG (Wickham 2016;Coretta 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied smooth functions with thin plate basis splines (bs = "tp") to "Year" by "Species" and "Delta Outflow" by "Species," and "Species" was included as a linear fixed effect. Finally, we printed generalized additive model results in tabular format and generated plots of yearly COG point estimates, 95% confidence intervals around the point estimates, the fit trendline and 95% confidence interval by species from the generalized additive model, and the spline effect of Delta outflow in million-acre feet on COG (Wickham 2016;Coretta 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Splines were applied to each biomarker to account for nonlinearity [ 22 ]. Random intercepts at level 3 accounted for differences between individual calls, and a binomial model with logit link was used to identify imminent risk speech frames in terms of the level 1 and 2 voice biomarkers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then rescaled the word counts to get the log2 frequency of occurrences per 1 billion words, so higher values indicate higher log frequencies. We got per-word surprisals for each of 4 different language models, covering a range of common architectures: a Kneser-Ney smoothed 5-gram; the long short-term memory recurrent neural network model of Gulordava et al (2018), which we refer to as GRNN; Transformer-XL (Dai et al, 2019); and GPT-2 (Radford et al, n.d.), using 2 We, furthermore, used the R-packages bookdown (Version 0.29; Xie, 2016), brms (Version 2.18.0; Bürkner, 2017Bürkner, , 2018Bürkner, , 2021, broom.mixed (Version 0.2.9.4; Bolker & Robinson, 2022), cowplot (Version 1.1.1; Wilke, 2020), gridExtra (Version 2.3; Auguie, 2017), here (Version 1.0.1; Müller, 2020), kableExtra (Version 1.3.4; Zhu, 2021), lme4 (Version 1.1.31; Bates et al, 2015), mgcv (Wood, 2003(Wood, , 2004Version 1.8.41;Wood, 2011;Wood et al, 2016), mgcViz (Version 0.1.9; Fasiolo et al, 2018), papaja (Version 0.1.1; Aust & Barth, 2022), patchwork (Version 1.1.2; Pedersen, 2022), rticles (Version 0.24.4; Allaire et al, 2022), tidybayes (Version 3.0.2; Kay, 2022), tidymv (Version 3.3.2; Coretta, 2022), and tidyverse (Version 1.3.2; Wickham et al, 2019). lm-zoo (Gauthier et al, 2020).…”
Section: Predictorsmentioning
confidence: 99%