Modelling event-related responses in the brain

Abstract

The aim of this work was to investigate the mechanisms that shape evoked electroencephalographic (EEG) and magneto-encephalographic (MEG) responses. We used a neuronally plausible model to characterise the dependency of response components on the models parameters. This generative model was a neural mass model of hierarchically arranged areas using three kinds of inter-area connections (forward, backward and lateral). We investigated how responses, at each level of a cortical hierarchy, depended on the strength of connections or coupling. Our strategy was to systematically add connections and examine the responses of each successive architecture. We did this in the context of deterministic responses and then with stochastic spontaneous activity. Our aim was to show, in a simple way, how event-related dynamics depend on extrinsic connectivity. To emphasise the importance of nonlinear interactions, we tried to disambiguate the components of event-related potentials (ERPs) or event-related fields (ERFs) that can be explained by a linear superposition of trial-specific responses and those engendered nonlinearly (e.g., by phase-resetting). Our key conclusions were; (i) when forward connections, mediating bottom-up or extrinsic inputs, are sufficiently strong, nonlinear mechanisms cause a saturation of excitatory interneuron responses. This endows the system with an inherent stability that precludes nondissipative population dynamics. (ii) The duration of evoked transients increases with the hierarchical depth or level of processing. (iii) When backward connections are added, evoked transients become more protracted, exhibiting damped oscillations. These are formally identical to late or endogenous components seen empirically. This suggests that late components are mediated by reentrant dynamics within cortical hierarchies. (iv) Bilateral connections produce similar effects to backward connections but can also mediate zero-lag phase-locking among areas. (v) Finally, with spontaneous activity, ERPs/ERFs can arise from two distinct mechanisms: For low levels of (stimulus related and ongoing) activity, the systems response conforms to a quasi-linear superposition of separable responses to the fixed and stochastic inputs. This is consistent with classical assumptions that motivate trial averaging to suppress spontaneous activity and disclose the ERP/ ERF. However, when activity is sufficiently high, there are nonlinear interactions between the fixed and stochastic inputs. This interaction is expressed as a phase-resetting and represents a qualitatively different explanation for the ERP/ERF. D 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.Keywords: Electroencephalography; Magnetoencephalography; Neural networks; Nonlinear dynamics; Causal modelling IntroductionClassical event-related potentials (ERPs) and event-related fields (ERFs) have been used for decades as putative electrophysiological correlates of perceptual and cognitive operations. However, the exact neurobiological mechanisms underlying their generation are largely unk...

Neurophysiological Evidence for the Time Course of Activation of Global Shape, Part, and Local Contour Representations during Visual Object Categorization and Memory

“…In this state, representations of alignment keys (Ullman, 1996), candidate object models, or object parts are activated. Later during the N350, this occipito-temporal cortex is active again, but this time performing the higher-order neural computations, involving recurrent and feedback interactions within these areas and with other areas, such as ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (Brincat & Connor, 2006;David, Harrison, & Friston, 2005), that support more sophisticated cognitive abilities with objects (Kosslyn et al, 1994), as well as implicit object memory (Schendan & Kutas, 2003) and perhaps familiarity (Curran et al, 2002). This state enables activation of the detailed visual knowledge required for the object model selection or model verification processes involved in abilities, such as basic level categorization of an object into a known class (e.g., dog, car, cup) or identification of individual objects like your cat or his bat (Ganis, Schendan, & Kosslyn, 2007;Lowe, 2000).…”

Rapid Interactions between the Ventral Visual Stream and Emotion-Related Structures Rely on a Two-Pathway Architecture

“…(1) Biophysically realistic models of neural networks that explicitly simulate causal interactions between populations of cortical neurons (David et al, 2005) . Tested models.…”

“…2a). The generative model of DCM for MEG/EEG (David et al, 2005) combines the Jansen model (Jansen and Rit, 1995), a neural-mass model originally developed for explaining visual responses, with rules of cortical-cortical connectivity derived from the analysis of connections between the different cortical layers in the visual cortex of the monkey (Felleman and Van Essen, 1991). In the Jansen model, a cortical area is modeled by a population of excitatory pyramidal cells, receiving (i) inhibitory and excitatory feedback from local (i.e., intrinsic) interneurons and (ii) excitatory input from neighboring or remote (i.e., extrinsic) areas.…”

Dynamic Causal Modeling of Subcortical Connectivity of Language

“…First, from a methodological point of view, we have shown that hidden neural activity (i.e., activity that is not recordable using noninvasive methods) can be recovered using parameter estimation of biophysical models of brain networks (dynamic causal modeling) (David et al, 2005. Second, the present data allow us to make specific inferences on subcortical-cortical connectivity during auditory language processing.…”

“…Alternatively, as a control of DCM overfitting, the hidden source was replaced by the CG [0,36,28]. Regions were interconnected with forward, backward, and lateral connections as described by David et al (2005David et al ( , 2006.…”