2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling five years of weather-driven variation of GPP in a boreal forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
70
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
70
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To account for lag effects between the response of to temperature variations we allow again for the lag effect using the lag-parameter α applied to T S (Eq. 9) as it has proven to be significant in similar light use efficiency model approaches as proposed by Mäkelä et al (2006Mäkelä et al ( , 2008 for sites in temperate and boreal climates. However, in cases of W being the main driver of as it is the case in semi-arid climates, the lag function is applied to W instead of T S .…”
Section: Formulating the Generalized Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To account for lag effects between the response of to temperature variations we allow again for the lag effect using the lag-parameter α applied to T S (Eq. 9) as it has proven to be significant in similar light use efficiency model approaches as proposed by Mäkelä et al (2006Mäkelä et al ( , 2008 for sites in temperate and boreal climates. However, in cases of W being the main driver of as it is the case in semi-arid climates, the lag function is applied to W instead of T S .…”
Section: Formulating the Generalized Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mammarella et al, 2009). Total ecosystem respiration (TER) and GPP were extracted from the measured NEE as described in Mäkelä et al (2006). EC flux measurements used in this study for model evaluation have also been published in Suni et al (2003), Ilvesniemi et al (2009), andIlvesniemi et al (2010).…”
Section: Description Of Site Properties and Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pelkonen and Hari, 1980;Suni et al, 2003). Therefore, the annual balance is affected especially by the temperature in the autumns and springs (Mäkelä et al, 2006). During those periods, the difference in temperature sensitivity of photosynthesis and respiration processes is an important controller of the carbon balance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model results suggested that the reason for elevated carbon losses in warm autumns is the stronger positive temperature sensitivity of TER compared to GPP. In the autumn, the day length has been used as a proxy for GPP limitation Mäkelä et al, 2006;Bergeron et al, 2007). Thus, any changes in temperature are likely to be more strongly reflected in respiration rate rather than in assimilation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%