“…Thus, all the intermolecular interaction models reported so far were achieved following either manual or automatic docking of the ligand into the putative binding site of the target receptor model. Given the enormous number of reports on the matter, we prefer to broadly classify and quote them according to the approach used to bundle the TM helices, i.e., (a) by ab initio approaches strongly based on the 2D electron density maps of rhodopsin ,,− or on the integration between 2D and 3D electron density maps of rhodopsin and inferences of Baldwin's analysis 60,83,238,240-244,246-248,250,255,258,260,262-267,269-278,280-292, 298-301,303 or (b) by comparative modeling, employing either BRD 160,161,163,165-168,170-190,192-194,197,198,200-202,204,205, 209,210,441,485-491 or ab initio models of rhodopsin, − , or, since very recently, the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin as a template. ,,,,,,,,,,, 378-394,397,399-411,415-422,424-438,440,441,480,492-503 Alternative approaches consisted of modifying helix-bundle models previously achieved using BRD as a template to incorporate the available structural information on rhodopsin, i.e., the cryo-microscopy 3D map, the outcomes of Baldwin's study, and the crystal structure. ,− ,, A number of computational modeling studies on the GPCR ligand binding sites are also reviewed in refs and −479.…”