1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3812(96)90017-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling gas hydrate thermodynamic behaviour: theoretical basis and computational methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydrate phase equilibria prediction program that we deploy here, has been extensively tested in the past against all the then available experimental data3, 24. Nevertheless, prior to applying this method we had investigated the capability of the phase equilibria model to predict correctly the experimental phase equilibria findings of the last years in cases where other works had been reported in the literature as failed.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrate phase equilibria prediction program that we deploy here, has been extensively tested in the past against all the then available experimental data3, 24. Nevertheless, prior to applying this method we had investigated the capability of the phase equilibria model to predict correctly the experimental phase equilibria findings of the last years in cases where other works had been reported in the literature as failed.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general phase equilibrium model based on uniformity of the fugacity of each component throughout all the phases , was extended to model the equilibrium conditions of nitrogen and oxygen (hence air) hydrates. A single equation of state (EoS), namely, the Valderrama modification of the Patel and Teja equation of state (VPT EoS) with non-density-dependent mixing rules, was used to determine component fugacities in all fluid phases.…”
Section: Thermodynamic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison of hydrate equilibrium of 84.13% CH 4 + 4.67% C 2 H 6 + 2.34% C 3 H 8 + 0.93% n -C 4 H 10 + 0.93% n -C 5 H 12 + 7% N 2 with 10.0% methanol with HEP, CSMHYD, CSMGem, and HydraFLASH, and experimental data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software is tested by comparing its results with experimental data and other similar software CSMHYD, CSMGem, and HydraFLASH, which are commonly used in hydrate studies and projects. 19 Finally, in order to test HEP code, the experimental hydrate equilibrium data of 84.13% CH 4 , 4.67% C 2 H 6 , 2.34% C 3 H 8 , 0.93% n-C 4 H 10 , 0.93% n-C 5 H 12 , 7% N 2 with 10.0% methanol mixture 72 was selected. HEP fits to the experimental data very well with 99.23% R 2 as seen in Table 2.…”
Section: ∑ ∑mentioning
confidence: 99%