2016
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201601760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Geomechanical Impact of CO2 Injection and Migration Using Precomputed Response Functions

Abstract: When injecting CO2 or other fluids into a geological formation, pressure plays an important role both as a driver of flow and as a risk factor for mechanical integrity.The full effect of geomechanics on aquifer flow can only be captured using a coupled flow-geomechanics model. In order to solve this computationally expensive system, various strategies have been put forwards over the years, with some of the best current methods based on sequential splitting.In the present work, we seek to approximate the full g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 (doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2018.03.002) means of the fixed-stress split, which assures that a sequential solution of the two equations is unconditionally stable [19,20]. Another approach is developed by Andersen et al [3,2] by using precomputed response functions. A problem related to uplift by fluid injection is subsidence caused by fluid production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 (doi.org/10.1016/j.gete.2018.03.002) means of the fixed-stress split, which assures that a sequential solution of the two equations is unconditionally stable [19,20]. Another approach is developed by Andersen et al [3,2] by using precomputed response functions. A problem related to uplift by fluid injection is subsidence caused by fluid production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means that a scalar approximation of the stabilization term, as given in (51) and also in [3], will not be enough. This problem was noticed in [2], and the exact stabilization term corresponding to finite element was used there to study a poro-elastic response function in the 3D case.…”
Section: A Two-dimensional Compaction Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means that a scalar approximation of the stabilization term, as given in (50) and also in [5], will not be enough. This problem was noticed in [2], and the exact stabilization term corresponding to finite element was used there to study a poro-elastic response function in the 3D case.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%