2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-1951(00)00041-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling grain-size distributions. A comparison of two models and their numerical solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computer models of sediment accumulation in basins have been classified into geometrical and process-based models (Den Bezemer et al, 2000). Geometrical models involve matches between the observed stratigraphy and the computer output by varying the input parameters that control tectonics and deposition.…”
Section: Data and Methods: Seismic Interpretations And Stratigraphic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer models of sediment accumulation in basins have been classified into geometrical and process-based models (Den Bezemer et al, 2000). Geometrical models involve matches between the observed stratigraphy and the computer output by varying the input parameters that control tectonics and deposition.…”
Section: Data and Methods: Seismic Interpretations And Stratigraphic mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most modelling approaches proceed by representing a grain-size distribution by a finite number of classes rather than by a continuous population. There are two prevalent process-based sorting algorithms (Den Bezemer et al, 2000): 'perfect' and 'imperfect' sorting. Perfect sorting is a more elementary representation of sorting processes than imperfect sorting.…”
Section: Modelling Grain-size Sortingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus active rifting is commonly associated with fine-grained sediments, whereas coarsening is associated with decreasing fault activity. The duration of the introduction of coarse sediments will influence source-rock composition and topographic gradient (Den Bezemer et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%