2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-555x(99)00127-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling hillslope evolution: linear and nonlinear transport relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
86
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Constraints on k at other sites are lacking, but given the range in T and V, we expect D to vary over less than 1 order of magnitude (D % 0.08 -0.6). It should be noted, however, that this value of diffusivity is much larger than those estimated for soil creep and other diffusion-like processes that have been measured at the hillslope scale where k ranges from 10 À2 to 10 À4 m 2 a À1 [see Martin and Church, 1997;Martin, 2000]. Diffusivity calculated for hillslopes experiencing episodic landslides tends to be $10 À1 m 2 a À1 [Martin, 2000].…”
Section: Appendix A: Equations For Nondimensional Variables and Parammentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constraints on k at other sites are lacking, but given the range in T and V, we expect D to vary over less than 1 order of magnitude (D % 0.08 -0.6). It should be noted, however, that this value of diffusivity is much larger than those estimated for soil creep and other diffusion-like processes that have been measured at the hillslope scale where k ranges from 10 À2 to 10 À4 m 2 a À1 [see Martin and Church, 1997;Martin, 2000]. Diffusivity calculated for hillslopes experiencing episodic landslides tends to be $10 À1 m 2 a À1 [Martin, 2000].…”
Section: Appendix A: Equations For Nondimensional Variables and Parammentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It should be noted, however, that this value of diffusivity is much larger than those estimated for soil creep and other diffusion-like processes that have been measured at the hillslope scale where k ranges from 10 À2 to 10 À4 m 2 a À1 [see Martin and Church, 1997;Martin, 2000]. Diffusivity calculated for hillslopes experiencing episodic landslides tends to be $10 À1 m 2 a À1 [Martin, 2000]. The much higher estimates for the Siwalik Hills, estimated at a much larger length-scale than a single hillslope, suggest that nondiffusive processes are being included.…”
Section: Appendix A: Equations For Nondimensional Variables and Parammentioning
confidence: 97%
“…with values for K D , the diffusivity, derived from hillslope measurements [Martin, 2000], i.e., in the range 0.01 to 1 m 2 yr -1 , leads to a substantial reduction in total eroded volume but does not affect the scaling of erosion with wavelength of dynamic topography (see Figure 1c), unless very large and unreasonable values of the diffusivity are assumed (> 1 m 2 yr -1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing evidence that many diffusional processes do behave more non-linear than previously assumed (Roering et al, 1999;Martin, 2000). Corresponding models suggest a continuous transition between linear diffusion at small slope angles, towards landsliding-like strongly nonlinear transport at high slope angles.…”
Section: Hillslope Gradientmentioning
confidence: 93%