2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling in situ activities of enzymes as a tool to explain seasonal variation of soil respiration from agro-ecosystems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highly consistent responses of GA and SR to N addition identified here support the utility of explicitly incorporating microbial activities and soil EEAs into models for predicting the dynamics of soil C under various global change scenarios (Allison et al ., ; Wieder et al ., ). Actually, several recent modeling efforts have confirmed that incorporation of soil EEAs into enzymatic‐kinetics models has substantially improved the projection of both the direction and magnitude of C–climate feedbacks (Allison et al ., ; Li et al ., ; Xu et al ., ; Ali et al ., ). Our results also have important implications for other global change factors, for example, climatic warming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The highly consistent responses of GA and SR to N addition identified here support the utility of explicitly incorporating microbial activities and soil EEAs into models for predicting the dynamics of soil C under various global change scenarios (Allison et al ., ; Wieder et al ., ). Actually, several recent modeling efforts have confirmed that incorporation of soil EEAs into enzymatic‐kinetics models has substantially improved the projection of both the direction and magnitude of C–climate feedbacks (Allison et al ., ; Li et al ., ; Xu et al ., ; Ali et al ., ). Our results also have important implications for other global change factors, for example, climatic warming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is therefore likely that understanding how soil EEAs respond to N addition could provide novel ways to reconcile the divergent responses of SR to N addition (Allison et al ., ; Weedon et al ., ; Stone et al ., ), a concept also suggested by several recent reviews (Fog, ; Knorr et al ., ; Janssens et al ., ). Evidence from recent enzymatic kinetics‐based modeling efforts also supported that inclusion of soil EEAs into models has greatly improved the estimates of SR and C–climate feedbacks (Allison et al ., ; Ali et al ., ). Therefore, it is clear that our understanding of the effects of N addition on SR will greatly benefit from the study of soil EEAs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…More importantly, it confirms that phosphomonoesterase activities which are measured under conditions of substrate saturation indicate potential rather than actual rates, since the rates derived from these assays are one to two orders of magnitude greater than gross organic P mineralization rates. For enzymes from the C cycle, in situ enzyme activities as affected by soil temperature and moisture were recently modeled successfully, showing a clear relationship to CO 2 flux from soil (Steinweg et al, 2012;Ali et al, 2015). Similar work should also be done for enzymes from the P cycle, including phosphomonoesterases and phosphodiesterases which have both been associated with the depletion of organic P in the rhizosphere (Chen et al, 2002).…”
Section: Role Of Extracellular Phosphatase Enzymesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Because warming methods differ in their effects on soil temperature and moisture (Chen et al., , Lu et al., ), soil microbial community (Chen et al.,), and belowground C allocation (Rustad et al., ; Schindlbacher, Schnecker, Takriti, Borken, & Wanek, ), they may differ in their effects on EEAs as well. Including cellulase and ligninase activities in soil C models may improve future predictions of soil C stocks (Ali et al., ; Luo, Chen, Chen, & Feng, ; Moorhead, Sinsabaugh, Hill, & Weintraub, ). However, warming effects on cellulase and ligninase activities, as well as the underlying mechanisms, are still unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%