2020
DOI: 10.1080/00207179.2020.1821248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling issues and aggressive robust load frequency control of interconnected electric power systems

Abstract: This article is concerned with modelling, controllability analysis and the design of aggressive robust controllers for interconnected electric power systems. The load/frequency controller relies on a pole clustering scheme and provides the fastest transient response despite any disturbance load application. The inherent saturation constraints are handled by the combination of a controller gain minimization scheme and an anti-windup enhanced controller design which provides stability guarantees, while avoiding … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system Controllability test was carried out on the intelligent master controller model using MATLAB and the results shows that the develop system was stable. This result in Table 2, validates the controllability matrix condition in equation 13 and [17,3].…”
Section: Controllabilitysupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The system Controllability test was carried out on the intelligent master controller model using MATLAB and the results shows that the develop system was stable. This result in Table 2, validates the controllability matrix condition in equation 13 and [17,3].…”
Section: Controllabilitysupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The load frequency controller was then designed using the expected wind power. A load frequency control model for an interconnected power system was also constructed [17]. This control strategy was applied to a four-area power system with integrated wind power (multi-energy injection for continuous energy harvest) in three areas [18].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considerable support has been made by the researchers in order to tackle the frequency regulation issue in the PS. For instance, the authors has examined Load Frequency Control (LFC) in single-area systems (referenced as [8,9]), deregulated energy grids (referenced as [10,11]) , and multi-zone systems with non-linearities (referenced as [12][13][14]) To manage load frequency in power systems, numerous control mechanisms have been implemented, including robust sliding mode controllers [15], model predictive control reference in [16], linear-matrix inequality [17], artificial intelligence-based LFC [18], resilient control methodologies [19], data-driven controllers [20], and robust virtual inertia control [21] and fuzzy logic control (FLC) referenced as [21]. Historically, the PID controller has been the predominant choice for regulating the frequency of interconnected power systems owing to its straightforwardness and economical nature.…”
Section: Literature Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For numerous power system architectures, the problem of frequency stability has been addressed. Researchers in [4,5] investigated LFC for one-area systems, whereas [6][7][8] investigated a multi-area system with nonlinearities, while [9,10] examined a deregulated power system. Several control methods have been used to solve the problem of load frequency control in power systems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%