2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/rcis.2015.7128864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling language quality evaluation in model-driven information systems engineering: A roadmap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that researchers have not yet addressed these problems satisfactorily 13 . Therefore, we consider it necessary to list the open challenges and to define (in a greater depth) the research roadmap proposed in (Giraldo et al, 2015a) in order to cover these issues comprehensively. Thus, in Section 2.4 we show a real scenario in which quality issues associated to the Sections 2.3.2 and 2.3.2 are depicted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It seems that researchers have not yet addressed these problems satisfactorily 13 . Therefore, we consider it necessary to list the open challenges and to define (in a greater depth) the research roadmap proposed in (Giraldo et al, 2015a) in order to cover these issues comprehensively. Thus, in Section 2.4 we show a real scenario in which quality issues associated to the Sections 2.3.2 and 2.3.2 are depicted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the subjectivity of the practitioners, the misalignment between the real application in model-driven scenarios and the research effort required, and the implications that quality in model-driven scenarios must be considered as part of an integral quality evaluation process. This chapter builds upon previous works by the authors (Giraldo et al, , 2015a and makes the following contributions:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations