2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling micropollutant fate in sewer systems – A new systematic approach to support conceptual model construction based on in-sewer hydraulic retention time

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of v was assumed to be constant and equal to the value (0.8 [m/s]) used for the Milan sewer network [ 38 ] due to the similarities between the two sewer systems. This value falls within the typical range of the average velocity (0.3–0.91) in the cross section of combined sewers [ 39 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of v was assumed to be constant and equal to the value (0.8 [m/s]) used for the Milan sewer network [ 38 ] due to the similarities between the two sewer systems. This value falls within the typical range of the average velocity (0.3–0.91) in the cross section of combined sewers [ 39 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of v was assumed to be constant and equal to the value (0.8 [m/s]) used for the sewer network in Milan [38] due to the similarities between the two sewer systems. This value falls within the typical range of average velocity (0.3 -0.91) in the cross section of combined sewers [39].…”
Section: Biodegradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the current approach to model biotransformation as DT 50 s, sewer residence time is by far the most important parameter. To estimate catchment specific residence times, the stochastic approach by McCall et al ( 2017 ) and Delli Compagni et al ( 2019 ) or a GIS-based approach as described in Kapo et al ( 2017 ) could be applied. Especially the approach taken by Kapo et al ( 2017 ) to estimate sewer residence time for gravity sewers based on the road network of a city is relatively straight-forward and easy to implement in ArcGIS.…”
Section: Integrated Fate Modelling Of Cecs In Sewersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mean sewer residence time could be accounted for by adapting the hydraulic retention time (HRT) within SimpleTreat. If more specific information on the sewer system is available, a more refined approach could be implemented to model sub-catchment and related residence times as a series of activated sludge basins similar to the approach described in Delli Compagni et al ( 2019 ). However, the performance of SimpleTreat is suboptimal as shown in a number of studies (e.g., Douziech et al 2018 ; Lautz et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Integrated Fate Modelling Of Cecs In Sewersmentioning
confidence: 99%