1991
DOI: 10.1080/02640419108729881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling mood states in athletic performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cockerill et al (1991) used multiple linear regression to identify which of Morgan's (1985) Pro® le of Mood States (POMS) were best able to predict the cross-country race times of 81 runners competing in the 1990 British Students' Cross-country Championships. When all six POMS factors were entered into Minitab' s `BREG' multiple regression routine as possible predictors of run time, the best subset of mood factors was found to be:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cockerill et al (1991) used multiple linear regression to identify which of Morgan's (1985) Pro® le of Mood States (POMS) were best able to predict the cross-country race times of 81 runners competing in the 1990 British Students' Cross-country Championships. When all six POMS factors were entered into Minitab' s `BREG' multiple regression routine as possible predictors of run time, the best subset of mood factors was found to be:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best of these methods, backward elimination, begins with a full or saturated model and the least important variables can then be eliminated sequentially (based on the size of the tstatistic for dropping the variable from the model). When stepwise regression using backward elimination was applied to the cross-country running results of Cockerill et al (1991), the same solution as that chosen from the Minitab output (equation 1) was obtained. Note that when both standard and forward stepwise regression methods were used to predict the athletes' run times, only the factor `Tension' was selected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If all mood dimensions were conceptualised as potentially facilitative or debilitative of performance (i.e., the ES for Anger becomes +0.70), an overall ES of 0.42 would result from the above example. The rationale for investigating mood dimensions separately rather than collectively is strengthened by evidence that successful athletes report higher Anger scores than unsuccessful athletes in karate (McGowan & Miller, 1989;McGowan, Miller, & Henschen, 1990;Terry & Slade, 1995); and higher Tension and Anger scores in cross country running (Cockerill, Nevill & Lyons, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cockerill, Nevill and Lyons (1991) [15] used a regression model to show that tension, depression and anger could collectively predict finish time among cross-country runners. This may be the reason that they show decreased performance and placed them in lower division.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%